When a new technological device becomes available, some people buy it right away; others wait until many have adopted it. Which view do you agree with?
The development of technology has been exponential in the recent years. When people are getting used to the technologies that they use at the moment, new ones are being developed and introduced to the market. It is very common that some people rush to access the technologies that others have not yet adopted. Though, it might be tempting to be among the first ones who access certain technologies but in my opinion, one should wait before using them. The reduction in prices and objective feedbacks are the main reasons for that.
The first issue that comes to mind regrading new technologies is the price. It is clear that when a new technology is introduced due to the high demand, its price is relatively high. Yet by the passage of time and when more people have adopted those technologies, the prices fall down drastically. Since prices are one of the key factors in selecting any product, waiting for the deductions in price is logical. Additionally, one can also buy the second-hand products which have a drastically lower price.
Secondly, after the introduction of a novice technology, one should wait until the true essence of it is revealed. Marketing has been a great tool in introducing products in this era. Most companies use deceptive techniques to convince people to buy their products. Although, at times these marketing campaigns can be truthful in introducing the products, mostly they are only targeted to decieve the targeted customers. Thus, waiting until other people have used these technologies and getting feedback from objective users can be helpful in deciding whether we need to use them.
To conclude, it is not important that we are the first ones who adopt certain technologies and products but it is important that we use them properly. We should not rush to access those but we should first consult those who have used them and weigh on the fact that whether they can elevate our quality of life. One other criterion that should be considered is whether they can provide qualities that are proposed by the provider.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important to read or watch news presented by people whose views are different from your own than it is to read or watch news presented by those whose views are similar to your own Use specif 73
- Wild tuna a species of large ocean fish have decreased in number because of overfishing Recently attempts have been made to farm tuna by feeding the fish in ocean cages until they become large enough for sale However tuna farming has faced several problem 71
- Broccoli is a vegetable that is popular throughout the United States but it can be grown only in temperate climates with mild summers Because of this limitation 90 percent of the broccoli consumed in the United States is grown in the cooler regions of Cal 80
- TPO 61 The golden frog is a small bright yellow amphibian that lives in and around mountain streams in Panama The species is severely endangered because of a fungus that infects the frog through its skin and inhibits the frog s critical life functions suc 78
- Nowadays many high schools and universities require students to work on projects in groups and all members of the group receive the same grade mark on the project Do you agree or disagree that giving every member of a group the same grade is a good way to 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, thus, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1719.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 346.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96820809249 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73538843581 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491329479769 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 540.9 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.563685787 48.9658058833 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2222222222 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.45110844103 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186043858652 0.236089414692 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0668878165474 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0520778530336 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119324221798 0.150856017488 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443159542553 0.0645574589148 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.