When parents cannot afford time to accompany their children, they could choose to send their children to child-care center where many children are cared together, or they could send their children to an individual caregiver. Which one is better?
In this modern life, it is so essential to care about children’s behavior. Because they are future of society. Besides, all the social problems make parents to work hard, and they are not able to spend enough time with their children, so they need to take care of their children in other ways. There are two options that parents can choose. One of them is child-care centers, and the other one is the individual caregiver. But an unavoidable question which seems the topic of controversy is, which one is better. I firmly believe, child-care centers is the better option. Although some might find this controversial, in what follows, I will elaborate on my viewpoints.
The first significant point to be mention is, this option can provide a great place for children to communicate with each other, and it can help them to enrich their social skills. Unfortunately, nowadays, parents have only one child. Thus, young children need a safe place to make friends and play with them. Take my personal experience as an example. My parents had a hard situation when I was five. They had to work every day for making enough money. Also, I was the only child, and I spent most of my time at home lonely. After a while, I felt blue and depressing. So they sent me to a care-child center near our house, and it became one of the best part of my childhood. I found lots of friends =, I play with other child who had the same age of me and so on. To wrap it up, I had a great moment there. Had my parents not sent me to the child-care center, I wouldn’t have learned how to make a relationship with other people.
The second and equally important point is, these centers can get children ready for school, and their personal career. They have lots of positive and informative programs for children. For instance, they have art classes, maths classes, sports, music and etc. Thus, it can help children to think out of the box, and choose their future career. It makes children able to be a useful person in the future. Besides, according to the recent researches, children in the low ages are quick learners. So, it can make them ready to be a successful and helpful people for society.
In conclusion, all the mentioned-points and examples lead us to the conclusion that it is better for children to spend their time in child-care centers. This option helps them to not only enhance their social skills but also get familiar with lots of careers, which is so integral for their future. Thus, according to all of these points, it is highly recommended that parents send their children to the best child-care centers in their neighborhood.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-28 | eli_yaghoubi | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-07 | sanaz.kv | 60 | view |
| 2019-08-14 | Behroozustad | 73 | view |
| 2018-01-21 | hughesmiao | 100 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 81, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...to care about children's behavior. Because they are future of society. Besides, al...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 252, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...t classes, maths classes, sports, music and etc. Thus, it can help children to think out...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, second, so, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 61.0 43.0788530466 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2175.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 465.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67741935484 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64369019777 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6578836407 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477419354839 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 658.8 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 20.0 9.59856630824 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.86738351254 428% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.6003584229 146% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.7109185464 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.5 100.406767564 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5 20.6045352989 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.76666666667 5.45110844103 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.410220380082 0.236089414692 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106237856451 0.076458572812 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0913713971916 0.0737576698707 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.292687778368 0.150856017488 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0914885552723 0.0645574589148 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.4 11.7677419355 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 58.1214874552 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.1575268817 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.