When parents cannot afford time to accompany their children, they could choose to send their children to child-care center where many children are cared together, or they could send their children to an individual caregiver. Which one do you choose?
There is no doubt that nowadays, the care of children is the most crucial concern of parents. They have to choose to send their children to a child-care center where many children are cared together, or send them to an individual caregiver. I strongly believe that child-care centers are better place for children. I think for two reasons that I will state in the following.
First, child-care centers where many children are cared together, are perfect to enhance children communication which is crucial for their future life. In other words, in these centers, children play with each other and learn how to communicate and treat others. In child-care centers, children not only learn better social communication but also solve their problems with other children. Indeed, they will not have a connection problem with others in their future, such as their schools or even their future job, because they learn communication skills. In addition, they have more options to have a better friend to choose.
Second, child-care centers with many children are more enjoyable for them due to playing with other children. In fact, children have more fun with play with other children who are the same age or near to their age. So, when children are of the same age, they have more common with each other that makes them enjoyable to be with together. My experience as a parent is a perfect example. I have a son, and I sent my child to an individual caregiver which was my parents. Although they were kind to him, my child did not like to be with them, and every day he was crying. After a while, I sent him to a child-care center where have many children. After that, he was going there with more enthusiasm. Because he might have played with other children, and had fun with them.
To wrap it up, all the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that because not only do child-care centers enhance children's communication but also they have a more enjoyable time in these centers which is important for their growing progress.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-12-28 | eli_yaghoubi | 70 | view |
2019-12-07 | sanaz.kv | 60 | view |
2019-08-14 | Behroozustad | 73 | view |
2018-01-21 | hughesmiao | 100 | view |
- There is no doubt that nowadays, boosting information in today's world is one of the most important concerns of people, and it is not important who teaches you. Some may hold the opinion that parents teach children more than children teach them. Howe 73
- TPO 40 75
- When parents cannot afford time to accompany their children, they could choose to send their children to child-care center where many children are cared together, or they could send their children to an individual caregiver. Which one do you choose? 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 376, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ons that I will state in the following. First, child-care centers where many chi...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 311, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...d-care centers, children not only learn better social communication but also solve the...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 627, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ions to have a better friend to choose. Second, child-care centers with many chi...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, thus, while, i think, in addition, in fact, no doubt, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1685.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 349.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82808022923 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57348067186 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 212.727598566 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.444126074499 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 513.0 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6072924417 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.6842105263 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3684210526 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.84210526316 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.444026876232 0.236089414692 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.171590374916 0.076458572812 224% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.159091400505 0.0737576698707 216% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.335501302364 0.150856017488 222% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113332058685 0.0645574589148 176% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.75 8.01818996416 84% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 86.8835125448 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.