When working on a project, it’s better for classmates or colleagues to communicate face to face than sending emails.
It is debatable whether it's better for classmates or colleagues to communicate face to face than sending emails when working in a project. While some people argue that sending email is better, I still believe that communicating face to face is the correct choice because of the three following reasons.
Firstly, face to face communication is more efficient than email discussion. When we have a face to face meeting, we can discuss and solve any problem right on the meeting. By contrast, if we discuss through email, we always need to wait for someone to reply and get the answers. As a result, sending email to address a project is much more inefficient than the face to face meeting. Admittedly, some people might argue that discussing through email can save traffic time to gather together. However, take into account that the time wasting on waiting, face to face communication is actually the time-saving choice.
Secondly, direct communication avoids misunderstanding in that everyone can see the facial expression of each other. This expression delivers many underlying meanings that can't be observed through letters. For example, when writing an email to ask for help, hardly can we express our appreciation, then others might feel that we compel them to do something and become angry. On the contrary, if we discuss face to face, then others can catch the appreciation in our face which ensures that this kind of misconception will never happen.
Lastly, when people gather together to work on projects, free riders will start to take this work seriously for they may get more stress from their peers. Humans tend to follow most people around them. Given that most classmates or colleagues concentrate on projects, the would-be free rider will imitate others and work together. In other words, as people can physically see each other, it is difficult not to participate.
Certainly, there are some advantages of work through email, such as discussing without traffic time and the limit of space. However, these advantages are not crucial. With the reasons I mentioned above, I think that classmates and colleagues should communicate face to face when they work on their projects for its benefits are far more significant than sending email.
- 15 The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants Recently butter has been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States This change however has had little impa 48
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for students to study art and literature than it is to study math and science Provide reasons and examples to support your opinion 76
- In a study of the reading habits of Waymarsh citizens conducted by the University of Waymarsh most respondents said that they preferred literary classics as reading material However a second study conducted by the same researchers found that the type of b 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for students to study art and literature than it is to study math and science Provide reasons and examples to support your opinion 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on is actually the time-saving choice. Secondly, direct communication avoids mi...
^^^
Line 5, column 173, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... delivers many underlying meanings that cant be observed through letters. For exampl...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, still, then, while, for example, i think, kind of, such as, as a result, in other words, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1897.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 369.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14092140921 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75310478031 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523035230352 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9592590306 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8421052632 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4210526316 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.36842105263 5.45110844103 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.569233091913 0.236089414692 241% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.187398622079 0.076458572812 245% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.216298219045 0.0737576698707 293% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.366709201397 0.150856017488 243% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.215973613773 0.0645574589148 335% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.