Which is more important for a leader: the ability to win an argument about an issue, or the ability to help others come to an argument about an issue? Use specific reasons and examples.
Many skills are needed for a successful leader. One of the most important skills is the ability to handle arguments. A great leader will be able to make people come to an argument rather than try to win the argument about an issue. I feel this way for many reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, it's beneficial for the leader himself to guide people until they reach a conviction rather than to force a solution upon the subordinates. Most individuals hate oppression in one way or another. As a result, giving people a degree of freedom would make the leader more liked and people would see her or him as a charismatic character. My own experiece is a compelling example on what I mean. When I started working a new job, my boss was so strict. He used to give me instructions on how to do the job without explaining why exactly I had to do things this way and not in a different sequence. Although most of the time what he told me was the best method to be efficient, I felt intimidated and paranoid. Consequently, I began to take what he said with a grain of salt. Our relationship was not good and I asked to get transferred to another location with the same company. Thus, having sufficient skills and knowledge on how to convince people to do the right thing without making them feeling at a losing position is essential for leadership.
Second, a leadership that helps people understand the whole picture first in order for them to come to their own conclusion is vital for a work environment or any other community of people. Employees would feel less stressed in a workplace that value transparency. In addition, informed workers would definitely be more productive than other workers who were just told what to do. More importantly, they would feel as part of the decision making process. Subsequently, a democratic workplace with understanding leaders would be more competitive and innovative. Moreover, trust would be built between management and labor. For instance, I remember my manager from a job in my home town. Whenever he saw me doing something in a wrong or inefficient way, he would always explain all the details to me so I would be able to figure out my won mistake. I always looked up to him and learned from him a lot. To sum up this argument, people would prefer a leader with high communication skills who is capable of ensuring all team members are well-posted with all the decisions the group is taking.
In conclusion, an admired leader, who stands beside her or his team making sure they have all the information they need to land on the right spot, is far better than a leader who would challenge other others in an intimidating manner.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-10 | Alina_irfan | 60 | view |
| 2019-10-08 | bishoy | 90 | view |
- In the past century, the steady growth of the human population and the corresponding increase in agriculture and pesticide use have caused much harm to wildlife in the United States,birds in particular. Unfortunately for birds, these trends are likely to 85
- london and german fossils 86
- “Overall, the widespread use of the internet has a mostly positive effect on life in today's world." Use reasons and details to support your opinion. 71
- TPO-16 - Integrated Writing TaskThe United Kingdom (sometimes referred to as Britain) has a long and rich history of human settlement. Traces of buildings, tools, and art can the from periods going back many thousands of years: from the Stone Age, throug 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, look, moreover, second, so, thus, well, for instance, i feel, i mean, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2237.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 479.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67014613779 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67825486995 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7965489318 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534446764092 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 699.3 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3186126079 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.48 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.16 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36 5.45110844103 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203135168429 0.236089414692 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0485435861468 0.076458572812 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0873086764112 0.0737576698707 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16755224485 0.150856017488 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.140219136843 0.0645574589148 217% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 11.7677419355 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.