Which is more important for a leader: the ability to win an argument about an issue, or the ability to help others come to an argument about an issue? Use specific reasons and examples.
Some believe that the ability to win an argument is a quality that leaders should be equipped with. Others argue that a good leader is one that helps others come to an agreement. I am among the latter group, and I will discuss the reasons for my choice below.
On one hand, if only the leader is the main decision-maker and the only winning party, the public would feel as if they are living under the rule of a dictator. If no one else’s opinions are taken into consideration and only the decision of the leader is imposed on the public, people would not wish to have this person as their head and make it hard for any changes to take place. For example, if the leader of a country decides to introduce a tax on a certain type of fuel while others are not willing to pay, this would simply lead to disagreements and protests which everyone wishes to avoid.
On the other hand, if a leader interacts well with their subordinates and makes them feel heard, people would want to follow them. The people under the leader as well as the public wish to contribute to the well-being of their community. This means that everyone will share the responsibility and would want to help with the changes that would occur. For example, if the leader along with their followers come to a consensus on the decision to introduce a tax, it would ease the process as people would be accepting of the decision.
In short, I believe that a competent leader is one who is able to bring people together and allow them to reach an almost unanimous agreement. Not only are such leaders more popular, but also more effective in bringing change to a community, as the residents are inclined to be helpful and take an active part in improving their region.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-10 | Alina_irfan | 60 | view |
| 2019-10-08 | bishoy | 90 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement For most jobs or areas of work understanding the limits of your knowledge is more important than the knowledge you have Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- If you could go back to some time and place in the past when and where would you go 60
- If you could ask a famous person one question what would you ask Why 70
- many people believe that greed or the desire to have more wealth than other people have is a bad characteristic people who are greedy are often considered selfish or unkind However some people argue that greed is actually a good characteristic for a perso 60
- Some people like to do only what they already do well Other people prefer to try new things and take risks Which do you prefer 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, well, while, for example, in short, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1428.0 1977.66487455 72% => OK
No of words: 315.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.53333333333 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46931075218 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 212.727598566 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488888888889 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 458.1 618.680645161 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.4294303314 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.25 20.6045352989 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212080733369 0.236089414692 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0934556328426 0.076458572812 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0908599091788 0.0737576698707 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161964472347 0.150856017488 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122880546305 0.0645574589148 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.29 10.9000537634 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 86.8835125448 63% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.