Nowadays, increasing students place a higher value on enlarging their social circle and opinions are divided as to the best way for students to make friends. From where I stand, traveling is a good time to harvest friendships.
First and foremost, traveling provides students with many chances to chat with others. As we all know, understanding is the first step in making a friend. When you move from one site to another, there is always much boring time enabling you to have a short conversation with someone besides. After those chats, you may get to know each other better and become friends. My own experience can demonstrate it well. When I was in middle school, I went to the US with a group of my classmates. I was really nervous at that time because it was my first time taking a plane without my parents. Fortunately, one of my classmate John sat beside me and took care of me during the whole flight. Although we have been classmates for one year, I had no deep understanding of him. During the trip, we visited museums talking about past experiences and even played games back in the hotel. He became my best friend after that trip and we still keep our contract now. Without traveling with my classmates, I could never meet a friend like him. By contrast, sport team and community service would not allow as many chats as travel.
Moreover, travel creates a really comfortable and relaxed atmosphere for kind talk with unfamiliar people. During your trip, you tend to forget all your troubles and worries making it possible for you to chat with someone else heart to heart. It will be easier to make friends if you frequently have deep conversations. On the contrary, the topics in sport team or during the community service are mainly associated with their job. There is less or no other development of friendship after work.
In conclusion, I think taking a trip is the best way to make friends because of the chances of talking and the relaxed atmosphere it provides for students.
- What is the most important action for the government to take for the protection of environmentalproblems fund researches on new energy sources such as solar and wind power protect forests and natural wildlife species pass and enforce laws to reduce the 73
- Some tourists prefer to travel to places that are very popular with other tourists in the places There are usually large crowds of visitors waiting to see a famous attraction such as a monument or historical buildings All of the tourists prefer to travel 60
- TPO36 Hail pieces of ice that form and fall from clouds instead of snow or rain has always been a problem for farmers in some areas of the United States Hail pellets can fall with great force and destroy crops in the field Over the last few decades a meth 80
- TPO35 In 1912 a bookseller named Wilfrid M Voynich acquired a beautifully illustrated handwritten book manuscript written on vellum vellum is a material that was used for writing before the introduction of paper The quot Voynich manuscript quot a 90
- TOEFL T P O 43 Integrated Writing Task 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 818, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
... trip, we visited museums talking about past experiences and even played games back in the hotel...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, may, moreover, really, so, still, well, as to, i think, in conclusion, talking about, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1656.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 350.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73142857143 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62509708275 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557142857143 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.8798804589 48.9658058833 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.8571428571 100.406767564 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6666666667 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7619047619 5.45110844103 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2547949665 0.236089414692 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0708194902485 0.076458572812 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648099547634 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181858627878 0.150856017488 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0306036223325 0.0645574589148 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 11.7677419355 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 58.1214874552 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.23 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 86.8835125448 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.