At work or school, you might encounter a problem that requires creativity – for example, you are given a task to complete that is very different from other tasks you do. In work or school situation that requires you to think creatively, would you prefer

Essay topics:

At work or school, you might encounter a problem that requires creativity – for example, you are given a task to complete that is very different from other tasks you do. In work or school situation that requires you to think creatively, would you prefer to work alone or with others? Why?

In this progressive and sophisticated world, being creative is one of the most central needs of human beings which should be fulfilled in order to improve the quality of life. This necessity can be satisfied during performing challenging projects and tasks at either school or workplace. While many people hold the opinion that teamwork enhances people`s productivity, others believe that by thinking and working individually the creativity will increase. As far as I am concerned, I agree with the latter perspective and prefer to work in solitude for obtaining creativity. The reasons to substantiate my point of view are elaborated upon hereunder.

To begin with, I am of the opinion that the main cause which assists humans to be creative during carrying out new tasks is being able to concentrate and focus on the topic. To be more specific, giving the entire attention to something through being in a private place, one can achieve productivity. For example, when I was at university, I usually performed my projects with a group of my friends. Although we had a great time together, since we spent a large amount of our time talking to each other, no one was able to concentrate and provide the group with novel and creative ideas. As a result, there was no creativity in our projects, whereas, when I was working on my thesis at the last year of university, owing to spending most of my time at the library working on the project solely, the result was overly different from other projects I had done collectively. Being able to concentrate effectively on the topic without any type of disturbance by the presence of other people, I got a great grade and my thesis was awarded as the best final project among numerous students. Had I not been provided with an opportunity to focus on the topic in solitude, I would have not been able to accomplish that great sense of achievement.

Moreover, working with a group, one might become overly dependent on other people and loses creativity. To put it in other word, when people work as a team, due to the fact that there are some other people who will lead the group, and provide members with creative ideas, members mostly may not challenge their brain, and as time passes they will lose this natural ability. My intimate friend`s experience is a compelling example of this notion. She told me that when she started working, since during the university she regularly carried out her projects within a group, her brain had become overly weak, and it got accustomed to doing simple tasks. Consequently, when her supervisor assigned her a different task which required her to think creatively, she had difficulty doing that, and it took her a great deal of time to make her brain fresh and powerful again. If she had done her university projects by herself, she would have not suffered from not being able to perform her tasks at the workplace.

In conclusion, having all the aforementioned reasons and examples into account, I strongly prefer to encounter my difficulties individually. This is because it enables me to not only be able to concentrate better and obtain the result I desire, but also to get rid of possessing a weak brain.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-10-15 r.bostandoust 73 view
2019-01-15 mahi22 70 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user r.bostandoust :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, may, moreover, so, whereas, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 60.0 43.0788530466 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 84.0 52.1666666667 161% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2659.0 1977.66487455 134% => OK
No of words: 547.0 407.700716846 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86106032907 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.83611736076 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82512609626 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 272.0 212.727598566 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497257769653 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 846.9 618.680645161 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 11.0 3.51792114695 313% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.4395916002 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.95 100.406767564 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.35 20.6045352989 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132714745251 0.236089414692 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0424313502624 0.076458572812 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0345787166026 0.0737576698707 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0789996164271 0.150856017488 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343954690894 0.0645574589148 53% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 11.7677419355 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.1575268817 124% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 86.8835125448 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.