Is it more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours
It is no secret that having flexible working hours has played a prominent role in choosing the proper vocation. Due to its paramount importance, individuals have tried to elevate their productivity while they are at work by adjusting their working hours. Although some might maintain the idea that working for three days for long hours is a better choice, I firmly contend that working five days a week with shorter hours is a much better idea. To substantiate my point of view, the following paragraphs represent a cursory at the most outstanding reasons.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that working for long hours in a day is discernibly effective on a person’s productivity. To put it in other words, an employee will get much tired when he works for long hours; consequently, he will not be as productive as he could be when he works for a reasonable amount of time in a day. My personal experience is a compelling example of this notion. I worked in a company two years ago that we had to work for 15 hours a week, no matter when we were at the company, all we had to do was working for 15 hours during a week. I decided to work 5 hours a day in three days to fulfill my commitment to the company, but I got unbelievably tired in the last 2 hours of days that I worked. Therefore, I decided to adjust my working hours in a more descent way, and I worked for 3 hours a day in 5 days. My productivity enhanced, I was not tired even a little bit at the end of the day. It is evident that working for shorter hours but more days influences the individual’s productivity exceptionally.
The second reason coming to mind is that people should be more involved with their work to prevent getting bored. To be more specific, they should work for more days, no matter how many hours a day, to be busier to escape from being at home and have probable challenges with their family members. To shed light on this issue, an example will illustrate this viewpoint much better. My father decided to decrease his working days in exchange for increasing his working hours during a day; therefore, this approach gave him more time to spend with family. He was at home on Monday and Tuesday and Wednesday. At first, everything was fine, but suddenly, my parents face some challenges in doing house chores due to their different styles of solving a problem. My father did not pay heed to my mother’s comment about cooking and other kinds of stuff. Although they wanted to do the same things, their different styles made them argue all the time. Hence, my father decided to go back to his former working hours to avoid arguing with my mother at home. The more he was busy at work, the more our home was filled with tranquility and serenity.
To be short, all the aforementioned reasons lead us to the fact that working for shorter hours but more days is more proper option. This is because not only workers’ productivity will elevate, but also they get less bored when they spend more days at work.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-11 | maryka72 | 60 | view |
| 2023-03-07 | Hibahtabbaa | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-27 | kevin1105 | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | Hibahtabbaa | 60 | view |
| 2023-02-23 | can111 | 3 | view |
- It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours 73
- It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours 73
- At work or school, you might encounter a problem that requires creativity – for example, you are given a task to complete that is very different from other tasks you do. In work or school situation that requires you to think creatively, would you prefer 73
- Is it more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sory at the most outstanding reasons. The first exquisite point to be mentione...
^^^^
Line 5, column 796, Rule ID: CONFUSION_OF_DECENT_DESCENT[2]
Message: Did you mean 'decent'?
Suggestion: decent
...ed to adjust my working hours in a more descent way, and I worked for 3 hours a day in ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 900, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...tivity enhanced, I was not tired even a little bit at the end of the day. It is evident th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al's productivity exceptionally. The second reason coming to mind is that...
^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...filled with tranquility and serenity. To be short, all the aforementioned reas...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, if, second, so, therefore, while, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 64.0 43.0788530466 149% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2491.0 1977.66487455 126% => OK
No of words: 545.0 407.700716846 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57064220183 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.83169070408 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68932243893 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.464220183486 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 765.9 618.680645161 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 19.0 9.59856630824 198% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.280839795 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.791666667 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7083333333 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.625 5.45110844103 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.382802509069 0.236089414692 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128748323495 0.076458572812 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113780976894 0.0737576698707 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.282313994358 0.150856017488 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0854412784483 0.0645574589148 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 58.1214874552 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.