Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Considering workers level of satisfaction is a crucial point that managers and industry owners should pay enough attention to it. People spend most of their day time in their workplaces, so it is important for them to willingly work in a specific environment. Some persons think that workers are more satisfied when they are assigned into different jobs. While, some others believe that they would be comfortable, if they carry out their routine repeatitive tasks. In my view, doing various tasks during a working day can bring more satisfaction among employees for two main reasons.
First, they would learn more new skills in their area of expertise. When managers put their employees from different ranks in numerous work assignments, they will have the possibility of knowing other skills which can help them to expand their working choice in a company. They can choose which part of the company satisfies them more for continuing their work in that section. For example, My friend, Jim, used to work for a company that produce glasses. He worked in the sorting unit where he was responsible for sorting the glasses according to their size. But, he thought that this job is so boring and similar that happens every day. In contrast, when his boss decided to establish a rotational shift work in different sections of the company, he experienced other units and found out that he liked to work more in quality analysis unit and he felt that he is more useful there. So, with the new set of skills learned from different types of works, they will have a better freedom of choice and satisfaction.
Second, it creates more motivation in workers to perform their job more efficiently. In the companies where their leaders give various tasks to their workers, managers prevent them from considering that they are forgotten and have no value for their company. When they are assigned with new tasks every day, they feel that they are involved in every aspect of the job they are doing there and this motivates them to carry out each of these tasks more completely than any single task, since they find themselves accounted for any of those tasks. For instance, I was a research assistant during my master degree period and I always forced to do the same experiments every week for undergraduate students. I found that frustrating, since any undergraduate can do it after some time. On the other hand, when I complained about this to my supervisor, he agreed to put me in other laboratories too. This helped me to get familiarized with other majors and I felt more satisfied about my job in this way.
In conclusion, job satisfaction is a vital issue among workers that must be never be ignored. Work force in any place can be much more satisfied, if various assignments given to them. This can increase the number of skills in workers and make their work decision much broader. It also makes them feel more useful and valuable in the hirarecy of a company.
- Some people pay money for the things they want or need Other people trade products or goods for what they need Compare the advantages of these two ways of obtaining things Which way do you prefer 69
- summarize the points made in the lecture about problems with living in asteroids, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading about benefits of living in an asteroid. 80
- How do movies or TV influence people s behavior Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer 95
- People should sometimes do things that they do not enjoy doing. 66
- It’s better to make wrong decision than make no decision at all.” Do you agree or disagree with the statement? Give reasons or specific examples to illustrate your answer. 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.0286738351 199% => OK
Pronoun: 81.0 43.0788530466 188% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2462.0 1977.66487455 124% => OK
No of words: 508.0 407.700716846 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84645669291 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74751043592 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59991606002 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.472440944882 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 756.0 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.8284311493 48.9658058833 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.583333333 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1666666667 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.20833333333 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270398667316 0.236089414692 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0795727234655 0.076458572812 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0698120458656 0.0737576698707 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174692935461 0.150856017488 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.081764640761 0.0645574589148 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.