Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The debates on which are more favorable according to workers - doing various kinds of tasks or doing the same tasks all day has garnered a range of views. Nowadays, many are adamant that a myriad of elements should be taken into consideration to check the constructive and destructive facets of this issue. Some people posit that accomplishing different types of tasks outweighs the cons of doing the same tasks. On the other hand, some others take the opposite side and disagree. From my vantage point, I agree with the former group. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following paragraphs.
The first exquisite point to be considered is that the improvement of productivity. When workers can do various kinds of tasks during the day, they will never feel bored. Consequently, the productivity rate of each worker will increase noticeably. A vivid example that can shed light on this subject is one from my experience. Last year, I worked as a part-time lecturer in a college. Fortunately, my work was full of varied kinds of tasks, from teaching students to supervising the students club in the college. And as a result, my productivity was very high because I had never felt bored from work. All in all, the diversity of tasks in the profession will enhance the productivity level of the worker.
Secondly, the second reason which deserves some words to say is that doing varied kinds of tasks in the workday will equip the workers with beneficial skills and tools. Although doing the same tasks in the day seems easier, doing different things in the work will help the person to improve their imagination and problem-solving skills. My personal experience is a compelling example of this issue. During my time at university, I had to work on different things at the same time. I worked on my graduation project, also I worked as a student union member. This situation had equipped me with many skills, such as, communication skills and problem-solving skills.
To wraps it up, In the light of above-mentioned reasons, I strongly that having different types of tasks during the day is better than doing similar tasks over
- Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harmful chemicals may be doing to the 3
- The zebra mussel, a freshwater shellfish native to Eastern Europe, has long been spreading out from its original habitats and has now reached parts of North America. There are reasons to believe that this invasion cannot be stopped and that it poses a ser 66
- Wild tuna a species of large ocean fish have decreased in number because of overfishing Recently attempts have been made to farm tuna by feeding the fish in ocean cages until they become large enough for sale However tuna farming has faced several problem 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Universities should require all students to gain some working experience as part time employees or interns before they can graduate Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Populations of the yellow cedar a species of tree that is common in northwestern North America have been steadily declining for more than a century now since about 1880 Scientists have advanced several hypotheses to explain this decline One hypothesis is 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 160, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... is better than doing similar tasks over
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, if, second, secondly, so, i feel, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1835.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 366.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01366120219 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84286692609 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51912568306 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 544.5 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.8667392454 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.380952381 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4285714286 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7619047619 5.45110844103 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304401443202 0.236089414692 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0816627029874 0.076458572812 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107498995788 0.0737576698707 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204823836167 0.150856017488 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0635507042471 0.0645574589148 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.