workers who do several tasks during the workdays are more satisfies than those who do similar work all day long?
Since the beginning of the current century, the turning over rate have been changes drastically. Given that people got bored from their jobs, they left them searching for new opportunities. Some people believe that workers would be more satisfied if they do same tasks during their workday; however, there is a substantial body of evidence that casts doubts on this belief. From a personal perspective, works should do several roles in their jobs; in order to ameliorate their responsibilities, productivity and experience. Below I will strive to explain my supporting points in more detail.
The first and foremost point, provided that workers involved in a variety tasks, they could improve their productivity. A recent survey conducted by Oxford University found that companies that gave their employees change to do many roles could achieve a consider economic success. Furthermore, doing a variety of work responsibilities not only could amplify workers’ experience; but also, their mental well-being. Consequently, having many different tasks during the workday is imperative.
Next, coupled with productivity, experience is another benefit of involving in many tasks. A vivid example that could be given to shed light on what was elaborated above is big companies, such as Costco and Walmart let costumer serves employees do plenty of roles, such as purchasing items, returning items and solving costumers’ problems. Likewise, carrying out different tasks could promote workers’ experience and multitasks skill. Therefore, doing a variety of roles has striking impact on workers’ personality.
Ultimately, having many work-related activities could enhance employees’ responsibility. For instance, pharmacists who do several tasks during their workdays, such as answering phone calls, counselling patients and reviewing prescriptions could augments their ability to manage the flow of the work in the pharmacy. Although doing multitasks put workers under severe pressure, it could cement their skills and help them to get better jobs with better wages. As a result, having the multitasks skill is crucial for employees to pull up their future with a lot of thrives and prosperity.
Taking everything into consideration; without a doubt, workers who do many different tasks during the workdays are more satisfied than those who do similar task along the day. It is suggested that companies design new programs that could help their employees to enhance multitask skills.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-15 | Christine hanna | 81 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 253, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...s change to do many roles could achieve a consider economic success. Furthermore, doing a ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 441, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...mental well-being. Consequently, having many different tasks during the workday is imperative....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 251, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'augment'
Suggestion: augment
...ients and reviewing prescriptions could augments their ability to manage the flow of the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 71, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...ration; without a doubt, workers who do many different tasks during the workdays are more sati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mployees to enhance multitask skills.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, likewise, so, therefore, well, for instance, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2138.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 377.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67108753316 4.8611393121 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09894933374 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610079575597 0.524837075471 116% => OK
syllable_count: 640.8 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.54882312 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.526315789 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8421052632 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47368421053 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327155973411 0.236089414692 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0986021601136 0.076458572812 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135163565022 0.0737576698707 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209574543681 0.150856017488 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134316256878 0.0645574589148 208% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 11.7677419355 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 10.9000537634 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.01818996416 119% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 86.8835125448 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.