Many students worldwide have to share their accommodation with another student while they are studying at the universities. There are likely to be a lot of issues of sharing a room or an apartment with a non-member of your family including behavioral aspects, habits and outlook on life. Although it seems uncomfortable, I would rather have a roommate who is neat and tidy because the absence of cleanliness could affect our relationship due to several factors.
First, I am convinced that living in a shared apartment makes people follow key rules related to respectful attitude to others who also live there. For example, negligence, when somebody does not care where they leave their rubbish or when somebody’s things are always lying around on the room, could definitely annoy other people who live under one roof. Moreover, the shared place of living is often rented and owners of the property usually do not like dirty things and littery flats.
Despite the fact that cleanliness does not certainly provide people with the fulfilment of life, I hope that neat behavioral habits can improve the lifestyle in general. Indeed, when the room is cluttered it is complicated to find something necessary quickly. As a result, digging among a pile of rubbish definitely influence the sense of satisfaction. If it takes more than needed time, people become annoyed and frustrated. Consequently, they can scold each other and destroy the relationship. Utterly, nor humor or even politeness can help in such situations.
Finally, the preference to be neat can be useful in self-organisational aspects. It is obvious that discipline and the order among somebody’s belongings impact personal features. This is the reason why children are educated to be tidy and organized from their early childhood. Furthermore, the right attitude to the cleanliness can improve the ability to manage things and keep the time. Consequently, people are able to manage their time properly.
To conclude, I consider that having a disciplined and tidy roommate can be beneficial for me because I will also try to follow such habits and to construct both the time-table and the order in my wardrobe carefully.
- People naturally resist making changes in their lives. What kind of problems can this cause? What solutions can you suggest? 67
- The line graph shows changing patterns of business communication in New Stratford from 1980 to 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- in some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 67
- The graph shows the change of average salaries in various spheres of employment in the US over a period of 40 years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features make comparisons 84
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technogy affected the types of relationships that people make?Has this been a positive or negative development? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 156, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rsities. There are likely to be a lot of issues of sharing a room or an apartment...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, finally, first, furthermore, if, look, moreover, so, while, for example, in general, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1843.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 355.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19154929577 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01008817599 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588732394366 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 595.8 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.845978455 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.388888889 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7222222222 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0707584494759 0.236089414692 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0206536157529 0.076458572812 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0306481899884 0.0737576698707 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0426846087459 0.150856017488 28% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.025383816576 0.0645574589148 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.