Young people today are less dependent on their parents than in the past Do you agree or disagree with the following statement

Essay topics:

Young people today are less dependent on their parents than in the past. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

Gone are the days when young people relied more on their parents than themselves. Today, with the development of modern technology, social media, and transportation systems, the average young person is more independent than ever. Due to the age difference of a parent and their child, the view of life, interests, hobbies may vary. Consequently, the barrier between the generations slowly begins to form, resulting in young people being more independent.

For starters, young people tend to obtain new information from the internet, rather than their parents. With the development of new computers and smarphones, people simply do not need the help of their parents. For example, if a person wants to gain information about a historical artifact, he would ask the internet. But in the past, this sacred information was always told by their ancestors, from one generation to another. Subsequently, due to the abundant amount of knowledge attained from artificial sources, young people become mature very early, which further servers the two generations.

Furthermore, the age gap between young people and their parents is not to be unnoticed. Adolescents relish various activities, savour different ways of life, and most importantly, build their future in their own way. For example, during family arguements, mothers and fathers would usually argue for what they think is right, completely ignoring the opinion of their child. Besides, about a century ago, people were forced to marry others judging on how their parents viewed their child’s relationship. Following this example, it is very important that young people can now decide for themselves, especially when it comes to marriage, moving out of an apartment, or simply enjoying sports activities. Sometimes, it is vital for young people to exclude the opinion of the elderly, since that is the only thing that might be holding a person back.

In conclusion, obtaining the skill of being independent from your family is very much needed. In the past, young people have been brainwashed by the ideal life that their parents might have “planned” for them. But now, due to artificial intelligence and the ability to mature at an early age gives the young a chance to decide for themselves.

Votes
Average: 8 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-05-15 sara.ana 73 view
2023-03-12 fmichela 80 view
2022-11-02 anman 70 view
2022-11-02 anman 66 view
2022-11-02 anman 60 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user fmichela :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 6, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Gone are the days when young people relied more ...
^^^
Line 5, column 823, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nce that is the only thing that might be holding a person back. In conclusion...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, furthermore, if, may, so, for example, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1901.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 360.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28055555556 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82939677513 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563888888889 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 571.5 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.3879962057 48.9658058833 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.611111111 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.45110844103 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289425589491 0.236089414692 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0984780611721 0.076458572812 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0667334262156 0.0737576698707 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181989047767 0.150856017488 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418575014904 0.0645574589148 65% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 6, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Gone are the days when young people relied more ...
^^^
Line 5, column 823, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nce that is the only thing that might be holding a person back. In conclusion...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, furthermore, if, may, so, for example, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1901.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 360.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28055555556 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82939677513 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563888888889 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 571.5 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.3879962057 48.9658058833 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.611111111 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.45110844103 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289425589491 0.236089414692 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0984780611721 0.076458572812 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0667334262156 0.0737576698707 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181989047767 0.150856017488 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418575014904 0.0645574589148 65% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.