Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole. Do you agree or disagree?
“young people have a great role in education and genuine making decisions” Tara Westover, Educated, 2018. Whether young people play role in important decisions is stemmed from their characteristics. Although some people believe that youth today have not a great influence on the critical decisions which determine the future of society, others repudiate the statement. As far as I am concerned, young people take a center stage in influencing on such important decisions because of their special characteristics such as taking risks, team-work spirit, and high level of energy. In the following, I am inclined to put forth some argument to support my position.
First and foremost, there is a conventional wisdom that “not adventure, not gain”. Indeed, youth’s taking risks is one of the part-and-parcel characteristics which helps them to make a genuine decision. For instance, they do not care about their positions and try to help people. Thus, by taking account of this characteristic, young people are able to make and influence on important decisions which determine the future of societies.
Another thing coming to the mind is that young people are better decision-maker rather than old individuals because of their special qualities such as team-working and great knowledge. In fact, it is obvious that team-working not only increases the works’ outcomes but also shows the possible drawbacks clearly. Thus, due to this characteristic, they play an important role in making critical decisions in societies. As well as, although they have not adequate experiences, their knowledge is not comparable with the old generations; many youths are expert in various subjects which helps them to make a genuine decision.
Last but not least, by and large, the young people have great energy to serve as a manager in society. The fact of the matter is that they are enthusiastic and energy-full. Furthermore, they can change the unjust laws, or improve the laws not by rebelling but by their decisions. The fact is that the main audience of laws or other governments’ decisions is the young people. Thus, it seems natural to assume that they will be vulnerable and care about important decisions. In sum, it seems fair to suggest that the young people affect the important decisions in society.
In a nutshell, although some people think that young people have not an important role in changing or affecting on critical decision in societies, I think they play a staple role. If governments had admitted such decisions given by young people, nowadays societies would not have suffered some problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-02 | ebiv87 | 71 | view |
| 2019-08-16 | marysv | 60 | view |
| 2019-08-16 | mohammadkmi | 60 | view |
| 2019-08-16 | mohammadkmi | 60 | view |
| 2018-12-30 | Ehsan Razmara | 73 | view |
- TPO 7, Integrated task writing 3
- Many problems of modern society cannot be solved by laws and the legal system. Laws cannot change what is in people's hearts or minds. 54
- TPO 6 3
- why are some friends important in our lives? 71
- There is little justification for society to make extraordinary efforts—especially at a great cost in money and jobs—to save endangered animal or plant species.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the st 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 117, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whether” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ns' Tara Westover, Educated, 2018. Whether young people play role in important dec...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 305, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... would not have suffered some problems.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, thus, well, another thing, for instance, i think, in fact, such as, as well as, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2221.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 419.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30071599045 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08196905782 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486873508353 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 674.1 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1615918544 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.761904762 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9523809524 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2380952381 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297179690469 0.236089414692 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0949686884395 0.076458572812 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.086963799193 0.0737576698707 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180832513331 0.150856017488 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0695805932648 0.0645574589148 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.