Your friend plans to reduce his living expense. He has following three options
1. Find a roommate to share the room to reduce costs
2. Buy fewer expensive electronic devices, like smart phones
3. Cook more at home (buy fewer expensive food items and not go to restaurants
which do you recommend? Why?
With an increasing number of people flooding into big cities, high cost of living standard has become problems for them and thus developing ways to cut down the living expense is extremely necessary for them, including curtailing the expense for housing, cutting down the budget for electronic devices and spending less on food in restaurants. From my perspective, finding another roommate is a desirable option for reducing the living expense.
First, cooking more at home is laborious and won’t help to reduce the cost at all. As a matter of fact, to prepare a meal, one has to take time to go to the market to purchase ingredients and spend much time on cleaning up and cutting up vegetables.Meanwhile, the food processed in the restaurants is not that expensive, which covers only a small portion of one’s daily expenditure. In this case, simply cutting down the expense of food won’t lessen heavily economic burden.
Second, curtailing the spending on electronic device won’t enable people to save money. Granted, a single electronic can be expensive, reckoning to hundreds of dollars. However, as a matter of fact, there is no need for people to frequently purchase newest electronic devices since the services provided by them are almost the same. In other words, hardly do a majority of people make a purchase for it. Even if someone desire to update their smart phones, such purchase only occurs once yearly or even longer. As a result, the money paid for them actually plays a little part in their yearly spent money.
Compared with two former options, sharing the bills for the house with another one can loosen the economic pressure heavily. In fact, it is not uncommon that a large portion of citizens nowadays fail to own their own houses. In other words, they have to rent apartments or houses for shelters. To live there, they are required to pay for the rent cost nearly every month and such expenditure can impose a heavy burden on their budget. Therefore, with someone sharing the same shelter, the living expense can be trimmed and thus relieve tenants from heavy economically pressure. My personal experience can be a compelling example of it. The last time when I studied in a university located in Shenzhen, I rented an nearby apartment so that I could spend less time on commuting. There are three rooms in the apartment and I only lived in one of them. However, I was required to pay four hundred dollars for all these three rooms even though two of them were empty. To achieve budget cuts, I found another student who also needed to find a room near university. After he moved to the apartment, the past high rent dropped sharply since I was required to pay half of the original cost while all of the rooms could be utilized, which enabled me to save money for something of greater significance.
In conclusion, in terms of cutting down living expense effectively, finding another one to share the rent for housing is highly recommended.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Students nowadays are more interested in politics than in the past 73
- When a new technological device becomes available some people buy it right away others wait until many have adopted it Which view do you agree with Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Grades encourage students to learn 90
- TPO72 80
- Which is the most important thing for a country s leader to assure the prosperity of the country 1 Creating more jobs for unemployed workers 2 Increasing agriculture and lowering the food price 3 Increasing access to affordable housing 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 250, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Meanwhile
...n cleaning up and cutting up vegetables.Meanwhile, the food processed in the restaurants ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 242, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'purchase the newest'.
Suggestion: purchase the newest
...ere is no need for people to frequently purchase newest electronic devices since the services p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 421, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'desires'.
Suggestion: desires
...make a purchase for it. Even if someone desire to update their smart phones, such purc...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 712, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...niversity located in Shenzhen, I rented an nearby apartment so that I could spend ...
^^
Line 7, column 1030, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...found another student who also needed to find a room near university. After he mo...
^^
Line 7, column 1189, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... to pay half of the original cost while all of the rooms could be utilized, which enabled ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, thus, while, as to, in conclusion, in fact, as a matter of fact, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 77.0 52.1666666667 148% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2476.0 1977.66487455 125% => OK
No of words: 508.0 407.700716846 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87401574803 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74751043592 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66628172145 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 265.0 212.727598566 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521653543307 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 787.5 618.680645161 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 4.94265232975 263% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.9567615085 48.9658058833 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.652173913 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0869565217 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5652173913 5.45110844103 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17993067135 0.236089414692 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.052867485046 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0548826822846 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114806715224 0.150856017488 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0448660925876 0.0645574589148 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 86.8835125448 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.