Your school is going to improve the teaching quality of the teachers of their high school students(ages 14-18), which of the following methods do you think is better:
1. To choose a group of excellent teachers; the teachers will attend an additional training led by one expert and then come back to the school to give other teachers this training
2. To offer all the high school teachers the additional training in effective teaching, using online material and teachers could study individually
As some people may hold the view that the participation of a group of decent teachers will be an effective way to enhance the school's teaching quality; however, others may take an opposite perspective and they believe that all teachers should have the additional facilities to be effective. As a student, I personally agree with the second belief. In the following paragraphs, I will delve into the most outstanding reasons which persuade me to put forward this perspective.
The first exquisite reason which advocates my perspective is the difference between the lessons. Since the high school schedule covers various courses such as physics, mathematics, and chimes, which are completely focused on the different issues. Consequently, the teaching methods of these lessons are separated from each other. In the other word, the way which the chimes formulas are examined and delivered in the laboratory is not equal to the method which mathematics materials are presented in the class. A vivid example can be given to shed the light on the issue is my teachers’ example in my high school. My mathematics teacher all the time asks the students to solve the problem in the board and share their thought with their classmates; on the other hand, my chime teacher does all the examination by himself and we just observe the process. Thus, all teachers should have the separate and eligible facilities related to their subjects to improve the teaching quality.
Another equally noteworthy point supporting my viewpoint is that the second option owns a flexible program. It is lucidly obvious that most of the teachers have the free hours in the evening and they prefer to spend those hours as a quality moment with their family members. According to the noteworthy intelligible statistics released by a recent research in my country, more than sixty-nine percent of the teachers in Tehran approximately own five free hours in their daily life and they prefer to spend that period for the issues related to their family. As a result, by participating in the extra training led, they have to eliminate or decrease their family activities to be accountable in the additional courses. However, in the second option, they are responsible for their own schedule and they can arrange it based upon their priorities.
The last reason which confirms the accuracy of my viewpoint is that the second choice in more cost and time effective. If the spotlight shed the light on the financial issue, it is explicit that extra training led or courses require a huge amount of money for their presentation; besides, the fee of courses is not the sole factor the transportation and meals for the teachers are the factors which increase the final cost of these courses. In comparison with the individual facilities such as free internet access laptops are more reasonable and affordable. About the time and its effectiveness, all courses need a term approximately about 6 months to present all subjects. If just a group of teachers attends to these activities and after a term needs that amount of time to present and deliver their knowledge to their co-workers. So, at the end of the semester, the teachers will be capable of enhancing the educational system, which has a trivial influence on the students.
To wrap it up, all aforementioned reasons and examples lead to the conclusion that extra facilities for the teachers to update their knowledge and information are more proper for enhancement of the educational system in the high schools. Since all courses do not have the identical teaching methods, and with the second option the teachers have a limber program and it is cost and time effective.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-12-22 | Tracy Wang | 70 | view |
| 2016-12-18 | Tracy Wang | 80 | view |
| 2016-08-23 | Gh.Ne | 70 | view |
| 2016-07-12 | Gh.Ne | 76 | view |
- tpo32 86
- Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve. 79
- Do you agree or not with the statement that a leader should have strong opinions and not change his/he opinions? 70
- Seven years ago, homeowners in nearby Brookville community adopted a set of restrictions on how the community's yards should be landscaped and what colors the exteriors of homes should be painted. Since then, average property values have tripled in Brookv 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the twenty years, there will be fewer cars in use there are today 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 340, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'recent research'.
Suggestion: recent research
...thy intelligible statistics released by a recent research in my country, more than sixty-nine per...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 445, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
...ase the final cost of these courses. In comparison with the individual facilities such as ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['besides', 'consequently', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'so', 'thus', 'of course', 'such as', 'as a result', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.245852187029 0.229887763892 107% => OK
Verbs: 0.128205128205 0.158761421928 81% => OK
Adjectives: 0.10407239819 0.0866891130778 120% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0286576168929 0.046263068375 62% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0573152337858 0.0685040099705 84% => OK
Prepositions: 0.116138763198 0.118717715034 98% => OK
Participles: 0.027149321267 0.0351676179071 77% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.83636362762 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0316742081448 0.0309702414327 102% => OK
Particles: 0.00150829562594 0.00188951952338 80% => OK
Determiners: 0.14479638009 0.0887237588012 163% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0135746606335 0.0209618222197 65% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0120663650075 0.0139019557991 87% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3699.0 2387.08602151 155% => OK
No of words: 611.0 408.028673835 150% => OK
Chars per words: 6.05400981997 5.86048508987 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.97176167858 4.48200974243 111% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.363338788871 0.338922669872 107% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.297872340426 0.251872472559 118% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.211129296236 0.174417080927 121% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.126022913257 0.112833075102 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83636362762 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 282.0 212.727598566 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.461538461538 0.524397521467 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 56.3722912074 59.2087087015 95% => OK
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6684587814 111% => OK
Sentence length: 26.5652173913 20.5533526081 129% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.9937448474 48.84282405 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.826086957 120.699889404 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5652173913 20.5533526081 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.565217391304 0.644075263715 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.54480286738 36% => OK
Readability: 56.3524514339 45.7405998639 123% => OK
Elegance: 1.81690140845 1.45489161554 125% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.514164451957 0.300154397459 171% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.127362229701 0.103427244359 123% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.082948568616 0.0752933317313 110% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.591059512263 0.497263757937 119% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.171776126735 0.151897553556 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.226275374031 0.114077575197 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0996343612276 0.0781384742642 128% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.539542206888 0.336927656856 160% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0615153963195 0.067059652881 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.389736968785 0.210909579961 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0592653417671 0.0618886996521 96% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8870967742 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.86379928315 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.91756272401 163% => OK
Positive topic words: 13.0 8.42114695341 154% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 2.4623655914 0% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.75985663082 145% => OK
Total topic words: 17.0 13.6433691756 125% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Less content wanted. Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.