tpo21
Both author and lecturer offer two opposing views on the side-effects of planting genetically modified trees. While the reading part lists some factors as the benefits of this incident, the professor counters these specific points and presents some clues to call into the question for the information in the reading passage.
First of all, the article names that the genetically modified trees are resistance and it is beneficial of this event. However, the professor refutes this fact. As she states the durability of these trees is allocated solo to a specific condition; besides, there are unified and share an identical features which do not allow them to handle the variation in the natural circumstance; in addition, if they face a situation, which is not desirable for them, all of them will die out. On the other hand, the ordinary trees possess the diversity which helps them to tackle with the different climate or ecological condition. Indeed, in any situation, there is a group of trees which is capable of surviving.
Next, the passage posits the economic advantages of these trees to those who grow them as the positive aspect of this event. In contrary, the lecturer casts doubt on the truth of this claim. As she asserts, there is a hidden cost which is underestimated in the text. The charge of seeds of genetically modified trees is more than the expense of seeds of natural trees. Moreover, for the sake of the law, the farmers have to regularly pay a fixed fee to the company in each cultivation of seeds.
Finally, meanwhile, the text surmises that this type of trees prevents the overexploitation of wild trees and save them; the professor rebuts this presumes. Based on the professor's assertion, this type of tree grows so aggressively, in a condition which this type of tree grows next to the natural, wild trees, they can significantly consider as a threaten from them. Since it outcompetes nature trees in the accessing to sunlight, nutrition, and water supply.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-07 | amy2016 | 70 | view |
| 2022-10-18 | Kalyani_tekade_24 | 80 | view |
| 2022-03-02 | Shahab950 | 3 | view |
| 2021-08-17 | aaron_105 | 80 | view |
| 2021-05-29 | m.ramezanii1987@gmail.com | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with following statement?It is important for governments to protect wild animals and wilderness area for the future. 80
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts. 70
- sop 70
- tpo44-integ 85
- TPO3-integrated writing 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 299, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'feature'?
Suggestion: feature
...here are unified and share an identical features which do not allow them to handle the v...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 705, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of trees which is capable of surviving. Next, the passage posits the economic ad...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 171, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...ssor rebuts this presumes. Based on the professors assertion, this type of tree grows so a...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 347, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ees, they can significantly consider as a threaten from them. Since it outcompetes nature ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['besides', 'but', 'finally', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'while', 'in addition', 'first of all', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.237333333333 0.261695866417 91% => OK
Verbs: 0.130666666667 0.158904122519 82% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0666666666667 0.0723426182421 92% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0373333333333 0.0435111971325 86% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0346666666667 0.0277247811725 125% => OK
Prepositions: 0.138666666667 0.128828473217 108% => OK
Participles: 0.0293333333333 0.0370669169778 79% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.78141778868 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Infinitives: 0.024 0.0208969081088 115% => OK
Particles: 0.00266666666667 0.00154638098197 172% => OK
Determiners: 0.165333333333 0.128158765124 129% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00533333333333 0.0158828679856 34% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0186666666667 0.0114777025283 163% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1999.0 1645.83664459 121% => OK
No of words: 334.0 271.125827815 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.98502994012 6.08160592843 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.04852973271 106% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.317365269461 0.374372842146 85% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.263473053892 0.287516216867 92% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.212574850299 0.187439937562 113% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.131736526946 0.113142543107 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78141778868 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 145.348785872 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547904191617 0.539623497131 102% => OK
Word variations: 58.9853322863 53.8517498576 110% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0529801325 115% => OK
Sentence length: 22.2666666667 21.7502111507 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.567112298 49.3711431718 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.266666667 132.220823453 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2666666667 21.7502111507 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.8 0.878197800319 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 3.39072847682 118% => OK
Readability: 48.6139720559 50.5018328374 96% => OK
Elegance: 2.0 1.90840788429 105% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.549945475472 0.549887131256 100% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.113418615276 0.142949733639 79% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0705113773113 0.0787303798458 90% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.606465819374 0.631733273073 96% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.166458204508 0.139662658121 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.260990091078 0.266732575781 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0886169917609 0.103435571967 86% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.529245229263 0.414875509568 128% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0837102388021 0.0530846634433 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.421765412395 0.40443939384 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0428980206404 0.0528353158467 81% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.26048565121 70% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 3.49668874172 200% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.62251655629 110% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 10.2958057395 136% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.