Your teacher assigns a project to you, and you can select the members to work with.1) choose the members who think and work in similar ways. 2) choose the members who have totally different ideas. Which would you think is more effective to work with?
It is tempting to think that finishing a project with members who have totally different ideas could rise the diversity of the team, leading to a better result of the team asignment. Nevertheless, from my perspective, working with people who share similiar opinions is a more effective way to achieve success.
On the one hand, teaming up with classmates of similar kind will reduce the cost of communication, which result from disagreements among team members. People who share the same character with each other are more likely to reach into an aggreement quicker and easier since they share similar logical partten. On the contrary,it is difficuty for total groups of students to agree with each other, which not only could cause conflicts among members but also waste significant amont of time for each student during the process of negotication. My roomate, for instance, once teamed up with her classmate to deliver a prosentation in Marketing class. Unfortunately, she and her team member shared totally different value and interest. My roomate wanted to force on finance industry and to make her PowerPoint look more professional. However, her classmate's merely interest was video gomes and he insisted to make their presentaion more entertain and interesting. Eventually, their cooperation went to an dad end. They had to do their whole work again seperatedly a few days before the deadline.
On the other hand, it is almost impossible to find a perfect time of meeting for every team member if they have totally different thoughts. The same kind of student are likely to have identitcal life style as well. It is not surprising, for example, that hard-working students usually get up early and usually do not stay up late. Nonetheless, people who enjoy night clubs and bars could not regulate themselves as strictly as other students. Taken my own experience as an example, I initially work with six people in my Business Comunication class to finish homwork. Some people were eager to finish it sooner while others did not want to start it untill deadline. Hard as we tried, we could only not find a proper time for everone and our homework was finished in hurry.
Admittedly, having a bunch of people who have different ideas could bring the team with fresh thoughs and unique perspects of solving problems. Nevertheless, a relatively simple school work asigned by teachers, such as a presentation for English class or a Math question, is unlikely to be so complicated that so many different views and creativity are needed.
In summary, there is no doubt that working with people of similar mind is a more efficient method to finish a task because similar people usaully are easiler to communicate, and that it will be less exhasuted to arrange a suitable time for meeting for each team member.
- Do you agree or disagree? Rather than help children with their schoolwork, parents should encourage their children do their work independently 83
- Most adults believe that modern children (5-10 years old) behave worse than those in the past. What action parents should take do you think will have the most positive effect on children to help them be have better like respecting and treating others kind 73
- Do you agree or disagree: In order to succeed in study or job，the ability to adjust or adapt to changing condition or circumstance is more important than having knowledge. 88
- Parents give their children weekly money to buy whatever they want.Some people think this can cause bad habits and ideas about money in children. Others think the opposite. What's your opinion? 70
- Your teacher assigns a project to you, and you can select the members to work with.1) choose the members who think and work in similar ways. 2) choose the members who have totally different ideas. Which would you think is more effective to work with? 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 324, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
...similar logical partten. On the contrary,it is difficuty for total groups of studen...
^^^
Line 5, column 997, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
.... Eventually, their cooperation went to an dad end. They had to do their whole wor...
^^
Line 13, column 314, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...s unlikely to be so complicated that so many different views and creativity are needed. I...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in summary, kind of, no doubt, such as, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2360.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 468.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04273504274 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65116196802 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79879622016 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547008547009 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 747.0 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0674494866 48.9658058833 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.380952381 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2857142857 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 5.45110844103 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243201635572 0.236089414692 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0714471075803 0.076458572812 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588328262922 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163650093566 0.150856017488 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0693336556776 0.0645574589148 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 86.8835125448 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.