In 1957 a European silver coin dating to the eleventh century was discovered at a Native American archaeological site in the state of Maine in the United States. Many people believed the coin had been originally brought to North America by European explorers known as the Norse, who traveled across the Atlantic Ocean and came into contact with Native Americans almost a thousand years ago.However, some archaeologists believe that the coin is not a genuine piece of historical evidence but a historical fake; they think that the coin was placed at the site recently by someone who wanted to mislead the public. There are three main reasons why some archaeologists believe that the coin is not genuine historical evidence. First, the Native American site in Maine where the coin was discovered is located very far from other sites documenting a Norse presence in North America. Remains of Norse settlements have been discovered in far eastern Canada. The distance between the Maine site and the Norse settlements in Canada is more than a thousand kilometers, suggesting the coin has no real connection with the settlements. A second problem is that no other coins have been found at the Canadian sites that were inhabited by the Norse. This suggests that the Norse did not bring any silver coins with them to their North American settlements.Third, the Norse who traveled to North America would have understood that silver coins would most likely be useless to them. Sitver coins may have been in wide use in Europe at the time, but the Norse, as experienced explorers, would have known that native North Americans did not recognize silver coins as money.
The reading passage and the lecture are both about a european silver coin which was found in one of the united states' site. The author of the article believes the coin was fake, placed by a person in that zone inorder to mislead the public. while the lecturer has a different opinion and she is of an opinion that these ancient object was not fake.
Fisrt of all, The passage states the fact that the place which coins are found is far from the settelments of the people in north america so it can vindicate that these objects could not belong to those people. This claim is challanged by the professor. She says there are many other things have found in those area and in the past people's travel to farther places is regular action.
Secondly, The author of the passage mentions there was not other coin in that site and it is significant evidence for understanding the fact that this coin was fake one because if it was real, they would be other coins beside it. This hypothesis rebuts by the lecturer again. She assers that those places were not their permanent settelment, also the coin is a valuable medium for ancient people and it is possible they brought it with them to that place and in return they carry their coins back with them. She adds it is not reasonable to leave precious iteams behind when they left the area.
Finally, the passage indicates that silver coins were valuable in european countries those days but they did not have meaning for native north american folks. So it is ridiculous idea to bring them to the area where nobody care about that object. The professor mentions the beautiness of those coins which can be attract everybody's attention . In addition, it was unusual object for the native folk of those area, so she thinks it was good idea to use them as a juweniers or neckles because it is shining and stunning.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-19 | Zmx_6 | 85 | view |
| 2023-06-29 | YasamanEsml | 80 | view |
| 2023-06-27 | Vivian Chang | 76 | view |
| 2023-02-16 | reza_fattahi | 80 | view |
| 2022-11-25 | nikki07hung | 85 | view |
- TPO34 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In today s world it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct 73
- TPO 45 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives Use s 70
- TPO40 Many scientists believe it would be possible to maintain a permanent human presence on Mars or the Moon On the other hand conditions on Venus are so extreme and inhospitable that maintaining a human presence there would be impossible First atmospher 75
- tpo34 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 150, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d states site. The author of the article believes the coin was fake, placed by a ...
^^
Line 1, column 243, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...hat zone inorder to mislead the public. while the lecturer has a different opinion an...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 305, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this area' or 'those areas'?
Suggestion: this area; those areas
...ere are many other things have found in those area and in the past peoples travel to farth...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 341, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...hich can be attract everybodys attention . In addition, it was unusual object for ...
^^
Line 4, column 402, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this area' or 'those areas'?
Suggestion: this area; those areas
...s unusual object for the native folk of those area, so she thinks it was good idea to use ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, second, secondly, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 10.4613686534 239% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 22.412803532 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1520.0 1373.03311258 111% => OK
No of words: 332.0 270.72406181 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57831325301 5.08290768461 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.24111762159 2.5805825403 87% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496987951807 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 479.7 419.366225166 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.6214247206 49.2860985944 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.571428571 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7142857143 21.698381199 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57142857143 7.06452816374 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241347110942 0.272083759551 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0801997126598 0.0996497079465 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0807930762893 0.0662205650399 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152929901224 0.162205337803 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385937223194 0.0443174109184 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 53.8541721854 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 12.2367328918 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.