4 working days in US
The author of the reading and the lecturer both are about the four working days in the United States.
The reading passage states that there will be numbers of advantages from cutting off 5 working days to 4 working days whereas the lecturer argues with the points and casts doubt on the main ideas of the reading passage.
The lecturer provides cogent reasons for challenging the points mentioned in the passage.
First of all, the author of the passage claims that decreasing from 5 working days to four will benefit the company and help to make more profit. However, the lecturer disputes this point by stating that the expenses of the company will be increased. He adds, it will force company to provide more training to the new employees. Likewise, different facilities like medical services, more resources, more spaces has to be managed which in turn results in company lose.
Second, according to the reading passage the 4 days working plan will decrease the unemployment rate. Nevertheless, the lecturer refutes this by stating that having more number of worker will be costly as mentioned earlier. In addition, the workers will have to work for over time so as to accomplish the particular task in time. Thus, rather providing the employment service it will add loads to the employees themselves.
Finally, the author believes that the plan will be better for the individual as well. On other hand, the lecturer argues that the individual will be at risk of loosing his/her job since he/she will decrease the quality of their performance. Thus, the plan has disadvantage to an individual as well. In addition, the lecturer thinks losing job will result in decrease in quality of life.
In conclusion, although the reading passage and the lecturer both are about the 4 working days, the lecturer has effectively challenged the main point mentioned in the reading passage by providing logically convincing reasons.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-06-15 | anazhang | 80 | view |
| 2018-11-16 | youracharya | 60 | view |
- When people succeed, it is because of hard work. Luck has nothing to do with success.” Do you agree or disagree with the quotation above? Use specific reasons and examples to explain your position. 60
- “Some people prefer to spend most of their time alone. Others like to be with friends most of the time.” 73
- To be successful at school or at work, we most be creative. 60
- Rembrandt is the most famous artist... 70
- Dudos' extinction 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...the main ideas of the reading passage. The lecturer provides cogent reasons for ch...
^^^
Line 7, column 282, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...workers will have to work for over time so as to accomplished the particular task in tim...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 349, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'result'
Suggestion: result
...on, the lecturer thinks losing job will results in decrease in quality of life. In c...
^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 228, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...providing logically convincing reasons.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, likewise, nevertheless, second, so, thus, well, whereas, as to, in addition, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 30.3222958057 155% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1621.0 1373.03311258 118% => OK
No of words: 319.0 270.72406181 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08150470219 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62128204971 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.467084639498 0.540411800872 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 488.7 419.366225166 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1559855273 49.2860985944 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.3125 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9375 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.3125 7.06452816374 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.09492273731 171% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165381666767 0.272083759551 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0663861452983 0.0996497079465 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0984012870845 0.0662205650399 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1119299514 0.162205337803 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101006801484 0.0443174109184 228% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.