Altruism
The lecturer mainly speaks about the close study conducted on mammal meerkat about their behaviour. The lecturer seems in disagreement with the author of the passage about the altruistic behavior of the mammal.
Firstly, the lecturer claims that meerkat guarding the group stands fully filled and does not really wait for the other members to gather the food. The author stands unaware of the recent finding and claims such an act of guarding meerkat to be an altruistic one. This fundamental difference actually means that meerkat never really cared about the peers but always cared about itself.
Secondly, regarding the act of alarm of meerkat, the lecturer posits that such alarm is quite frivolous and does not really help for the protection of the other family members. The meerkat is able to direct attention of the predator towards the others thus benefitting itself just to flee away. Such nuances of meerkat behaviours is ignored by the author and blatantly claims meerkat to be a saviour.
Thirdly, the speaker also denies the selflessness attitude in humans while helping others. The speaker claims such a person will seek for social acceptance and self-worthiness by quoting the example of kidney donor. The author neglects such side benefits and just keeps focussing on the act rather than motives.
In and all, the author and the lecturer seems in mutual disagreement regarding the altruistic behaviours either in animals or even in humans.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-01 | IshaanN04 | 60 | view |
| 2023-04-17 | Yam Kumar Oli | 35 | view |
| 2023-04-17 | Yam Kumar Oli | 52 | view |
| 2023-03-14 | Anurag96 | 80 | view |
| 2023-03-14 | Anurag96 | 3 | view |
- If you could change one important thing about your hometown, what wouldyou change? Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer. 73
- Some young adults want independence from their parents as soon as possible. Other young adults prefer to live with their families for a longer time. Which of these situations do you think is better? 73
- Altruism 3
- If you could change one important thing about your hometown, what wouldyou change? Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A person should nevermake an important decision alone. Use specific reasons and examples to supportyour answer. 3
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, if, really, regarding, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 12.0772626932 25% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 22.412803532 31% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1245.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 237.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25316455696 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53099147668 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535864978903 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 362.7 419.366225166 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.5372045919 49.2860985944 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.75 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.08333333333 7.06452816374 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.