Altruitism
The author tries to establish a point of view that the benevolent nature of animals as well as humans encourage to perform activities to help others that might not necessarily be advantageous for themselves. Surprisingly, the lecturer seems to be quite at odds with him/ her. By refuting the example of Meercat as well as humans provided by the essayist, the speaker justifies her claim saying that these supposedly called "self-less" activities are not all self less.
As the author tries to substantiate his/ her first argument with the example of Meerat, a mammal that stays guard on an empty stomach who waits for safety of its group and warns its friends against the predator durign its food hunt, the speaker dismisses each of these behaviors as altrusitic. According to her, the recent study of these animals discovered that the not only did those animals in guard eat first before their group, but they were also the first to flee if they were to ever sense danger as well as the act of calling out could cause others to gather rogether, imposing more danger. Consequently, the orator shows how these sentinels are not truly self less animals.
Moving further, the lecturer also brings light into some of the loopholes of the wirter's explanations on the acts of humans. As the author tries to justify the action of kindness such as donations of organs by people to their closed ones as well as strangers, the speaker tries to shift the attention to other direction. She mentions how this is motivated by a person's desire for praise, feeling of self worth and other non materialistic rewards. As a result, even the humans are selfish beings.
It is in this manner that the orator repudiates each of the points made by the essayist about both the Meerat mammals as well as humans. Consequently, she justifies how everyone is driven by self interest and no one is anything such as altruistic.
- Bird decline 80
- In the 1950s Torreya taxifoha, a type of evergreen tree once very common in the state of Florida, started to die out. No one is sure exactly what caused the decline, but chances are good that if nothing is done, Torreya will soon become extinct. Experts a 3
- In the 1950s Torreya taxifolia, a type of evergreen tree once very common in the state of Florida, started to die out. No one is sure exactly what caused the decline, but chances are good that if nothing is done, Torreya will soon become extinct. Experts 3
- Torreya taxifolia, 3
- Torreya taxifolia, 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 113, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'performing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'encourage' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: performing
... of animals as well as humans encourage to perform activities to help others that might no...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 669, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun animals is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... how these sentinels are not truly self less animals. Moving further, the lectu...
^^^^
Line 9, column 53, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...er, the lecturer also brings light into some of the loopholes of the wirters explanations o...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 388, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...otivated by a persons desire for praise, feeling of self worth and other non mate...
^^
Line 13, column 119, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... essayist about both the Meerat mammals as well as humans. Consequently, she justifies how...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, so, well, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 30.3222958057 152% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1596.0 1373.03311258 116% => OK
No of words: 327.0 270.72406181 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88073394495 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7311008748 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 145.348785872 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562691131498 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 419.366225166 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.5454098124 49.2860985944 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.0 110.228320801 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.25 21.698381199 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06452816374 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.3589403974 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 53.8541721854 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.0289183223 114% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.