ancient vessels
The reading presents some evidence which indicate that the ancient vessels which were found in Iraq, were not used as electric batteries. The professor, however, finds the idea dubious and refutes all the claims made in the article.
First, the author asserts that the vessels would have been attached to some electricity conductors like metal wires if they were batteries. The lecturer, on the other hand, argues that due to the fact that local people have found them they might have recognized only the vessels and have eliminated the metal wires.
Furthermore, the writer states that these vessels resembles the scrolls of sacred texts, which had not been utilized for generating electricity. In contrast, the speaker contends that it couldn't prove this claim. The vessels might have been versatile and ahd different functions.
Finally, the readind passage claims that if they had been batteries, what applications they might have had? Ancient people did not have any device to use these batteries. The professor, on the other side, proposes that they could use those vessels for shock, and invisible and magical power, as well as heating. In addition, doctors might have take many advantages from those batteries for healing and pains.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 283, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ght have recognized only the vessels and have eliminated the metal wires. Furt...
^^
Line 7, column 188, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
... contrast, the speaker contends that it couldnt prove this claim. The vessels might hav...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 345, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'taken'.
Suggestion: taken
...eating. In addition, doctors might have take many advantages from those batteries fo...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, however, if, so, well, in addition, in contrast, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 30.3222958057 40% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1050.0 1373.03311258 76% => OK
No of words: 200.0 270.72406181 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40912847312 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 145.348785872 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 315.9 419.366225166 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.3099603847 49.2860985944 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4545454545 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1818181818 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.72727272727 7.06452816374 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223175455189 0.272083759551 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0830823468306 0.0996497079465 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.073030001642 0.0662205650399 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139696322724 0.162205337803 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0297558210193 0.0443174109184 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.3589403974 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 63.6247240618 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.