Asteroids are large space objects made of rock and ice. There are hundreds of thousands of asteroids in our solar system. Though we often hear ideas about establishing colonies of humans to live and work on our Moon or our neighboring planet, Mars, some think that sending people to an asteroid would actually be the best colonization option for a number of reasons
Low Gravity
To begin with, asteroids are often much smaller than planets, so they have lower gravity. When landing a spaceship, the craft would not be pulled as strongly or as forcefully toward the asteroid's surface, making the landing safer than landing on the Moon or Mars; it would also allow a spacecraft to carry much more equipment needed to set up the colony. It would also be easier for the spacecraft to take off again, so the spaceship would need to carry considerably less fuel for the trip back to Earth.
Mining Valuable Metals
Next some asteroids are rich in valuable elements and precious metals that are relatively rare on Earth, such as gold and platinum. An asteroid colony would be extremely profitable and a good source of these raw materials. The colonists or businesses sponsoring them could more than pay for the cost of their support by mining minerals and sending them back to Earth.
Easy to Reach
Finally, asteroids are a good option for colonization because some of them would be very easy to reach. There are a number of asteroids that periodically come within or near Earth's orbit. Some of them actually get closer to Earth than our Moon. So these asteroids would be much easier and more affordable to get to and get back from than a planet like Mars, which would require a two-year trip in each direction.
According to reading passage it is safe to create colonization in the asteroid rather than moon. The author illustrates three reasons to support his opinion. Based on the passage, people will be more benefited since landing on asteroid is more safe than moon, the colonization will be more profitable due to some valuable resource and finally it is easy to reach in asteroid. But, the lecturer clearly opposes this idea and provides specific reasons to describe the problems associated to landing on asteroid.
First, the writer claims that, due to lower gravity on asteroid it is safe to land on asteroid than moon. However, the professor disagrees with that by saying this, although landing is safe but there is risk factor like health problems. Since lower gravity reduces bone and muscle density.
Second, the reading states that, asteroid are rich in precious metal that make the colonization more profitable. On the contrary, the speaker suggests that it does not seem such profitable because, the transportation cost reduces the profit. Again, he put forward his idea by adding that plenty of transportation of valuable metals in the market reduces the price and this case it will not so profitable.
Third, the passage mentions that reaching to the asteroid is easy than moon. On the other hand, the lecture cast doubt on this idea, he says that in spite of easy reaching, it is more difficult to return from the asteroid. Additionally he claims that, asteroid become close to the earth at a certain point and being in a continuous movement it is not so easy to reach to the asteroid
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-05 | hamiddelbari | 80 | view |
| 2019-10-05 | hamiddelbari | 80 | view |
- TPO-07 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 3
- TPO 48 - Integrated Writing Task 80
- Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth century Dutch painters However there are doubts whether some paintings attributed to Rembrandt were actually painted by him One such painting is known as attributed to Rembrandt because of its style and inde 73
- In the United States employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day However many employees want to work a four day week and are willing to accept less pay in order to do so A mandatory policy requiring companies to offer their employee
- TPO 44 - Integrated Writing Task 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 224, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Additionally,
... difficult to return from the asteroid. Additionally he claims that, asteroid become close t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, second, so, third, in spite of, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1332.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 269.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95167286245 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61868931994 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513011152416 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 416.7 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6210144243 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.461538462 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6923076923 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.69230769231 7.06452816374 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128431843159 0.272083759551 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0507719205322 0.0996497079465 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0404816506613 0.0662205650399 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0813816253483 0.162205337803 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0332248289672 0.0443174109184 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.