Automatic cars have positive impact on humans.
The author introduces the topic of self driving or autonomous cars. These cars don't need people to drive, they work based on the sensors and computer technology. The author says that these kind of carss have positive impact on the drivers. The lecturer condemns this by finding flaws in each point made by the author.
Firstly, the author says that self-driving cars reduces car crashes as car crashes are happening because of the human error. The lecturer opposes this saying that the example shared by author, that a tested self-driving car which drove around 7000 miles had a car accident month ago. Also the lecturer supports this claim saying that all the computer related works are always error prone, and raises a question that, How safe these self-driving cars are ?
Secondly the author states that self-driving cars are good for environment as they don't have to start and stop regularly which helps in reducing the pollution. The lecturer finds flaw in this saying that, self-driving cars no longer need license, which will lead to young adults driving the car and inturn increasing the number of cars that people use. Even though the pollution generated by a single car is reduced, increased nuber of cars leads to increased pollution.
Finally, the author makes another claim that, it gives people extra time, which can be used for another works like reading or spending on work. The lecturer critically disagrees this point saying that, giving extra time to do the regular work, which people always do, make people feel that driving is no more different to regular time. Also driving can be used as relaxing for few poeple, which now has no more seen as quality time. Giving extra time to do the regular work, which people always do make people feel that driving is no more different to regular time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-18 | chaithu067 | 80 | view |
- Marcopolo s published book is a lie
- Automatic cars have positive impact on humans 80
- All the claims made in The Travles of Marco Polo are false
- Our current way of life will have negative impact on future generations Agree or Disagree 60
- Movies and television have negative impacts on young people Do you agree or disagree 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 80, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... driving or autonomous cars. These cars dont need people to drive, they work based o...
^^^^
Line 1, column 184, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...mputer technology. The author says that these kind of carss have positive impact on the dr...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 285, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...000 miles had a car accident month ago. Also the lecturer supports this claim saying...
^^^^
Line 5, column 84, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...g cars are good for environment as they dont have to start and stop regularly which ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 26, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... pollution. Finally, the author makes another claim that, it gives people extr...
^^
Line 7, column 338, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...g is no more different to regular time. Also driving can be used as relaxing for few...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 12.0772626932 166% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1514.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 308.0 270.72406181 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91558441558 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30730946384 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 145.348785872 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 454.5 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8424049343 49.2860985944 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.142857143 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57142857143 7.06452816374 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166316467758 0.272083759551 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0724654482907 0.0996497079465 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0813480650847 0.0662205650399 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119406100507 0.162205337803 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0691928648148 0.0443174109184 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.