The cane toad is a large (1.8kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers’ crops by eating harmful insects.
Unfortunately, the toad multiplied rapidly, and a large cane toad population now threatens small native animals that are not pests. Several measures have been proposed to stop the spread of the cane toad in Australia.
One way to prevent the spread of the load would be to build a national fence. A fence that blocks the advance of the toads will prevent them from moving into those parts of Australia that they
have not yet colonized. This approach has been used before: a national fence was erected in the early part of the twentieth century to prevent the spread of rabbits, another animal species that was introduced in Australia from abroad and had a harmful impact on its native ecosystems.
Second, the toads could be captured and destroyed by volunteers. Cane toads can easily be caught in simple traps and can even be captured by hand. Young toads and cane toad eggs are even easier to gather and destroy, since they are restricted to the water. If the Australian government were to organize a campaign among Australian citizens to join forces to destroy the toads, the collective effort might stop the toad from spreading.
Third, researchers are developing a disease-causing virus to control the cane toad populations. This virus will be specially designed: although it will be able to infect a number of reptile and amphibian species, it will not harm most of the infected species; it will specially harm only the cane toads. The virus will control the population of cane toads by preventing them from maturing and reproducing.
Both the Lecture and the reading passage are discussing the measures taken by Australia to stop the spread of the cane toad. The former is of opinion that their are many flaws in he proposed methods. While the latter provides three reasons in support of it.
To begin with, the first issue we encounter is associated with the construction of a national fence. The professor highlights that it won't be easy as this may cause unwanted environmental damage. Additionally, eggs of cane toad were usually found in streaming water and travel from one place to another. So, there was a possibility that some may travel to other side and multiply there. On the other hand, the text posits that it is very effective as this approach was also used by the Australia in past to prevent spread of rabbits.
Moreover, another topic of debate revolves around destruction by volunteers. The speaker points out that it could be successful but untrained volunteers may destroys the native frogs. Furthermore, this may cause a major harm to useful frog species. However, the author mentions that young toads and toad cane eggs are easy to gather and destroy and don't need any training.
Thirdly, the final point of discussion is connected with development of disease causing virus. The lecture claims that it is a bad idea and have terrible consequences for original habitat especially in America. To add on, when pet collectors may take any infected toad cane and it reach to America. It may destroys the native species. Nevertheless, the passage states that it will be specially designed and will not harm most of the infected species other than toad cane.
To conclude, it is quite visible that the author and the lecturer had conflicting views about controlling toad cane species in Australia. They are having trouble in finding common grounds on this issue.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-11 | Umme Abiha | 81 | view |
| 2022-12-27 | YAGUT | 78 | view |
| 2022-12-27 | YAGUT | 83 | view |
| 2022-12-26 | YAGUT | 78 | view |
| 2022-08-31 | Ibne Arabi | 83 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because the world is changing so quickly people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 75
- Because modern life is very complex it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize 76
- Government should spend finance in arts field like they spend on athletes Do u agree or disagree 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 156, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
...ane toad. The former is of opinion that their are many flaws in he proposed methods. ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 201, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... are many flaws in he proposed methods. While the latter provides three reasons in su...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 350, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...eggs are easy to gather and destroy and dont need any training. Thirdly, the fina...
^^^^
Line 7, column 282, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'reaches'?
Suggestion: reaches
... may take any infected toad cane and it reach to America. It may destroys the native ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, third, thirdly, while, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1547.0 1373.03311258 113% => OK
No of words: 311.0 270.72406181 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97427652733 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6316319479 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 145.348785872 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59807073955 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 419.366225166 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.3352009814 49.2860985944 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.4210526316 110.228320801 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3684210526 21.698381199 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.73684210526 7.06452816374 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 4.45695364238 269% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212904213105 0.272083759551 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0557625232167 0.0996497079465 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488094875932 0.0662205650399 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113156254815 0.162205337803 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0268599210614 0.0443174109184 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.3589403974 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 63.6247240618 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.