Car manufacturers and governments have been eagerly seeking a replacement for the automobile's main source of power, the internal-combustion engine
The reading and the lecture are both about the hydrogen-based fuel-cell engine. The author mentions three main benefits of this new technology. The professor from the listening passage disagrees with the author's points. She thinks that even though the article is correct, it is way more optimistic. The professor also adds that this new technology would not solve the problems as the author mentions that it will be.
First of all, according to the author since the hydrogen-based fuel-cell engine relies on water and natural gas, this source's availability in nature is unlike the oil: it is unlimited. The professor, however, casts doubt on this by saying although the main sources of this technology are unlimited, the processing and the technical requirements of this technology is extremely difficult. The requirement of an eligible temperature, for instance, is minis 200 Celcius degreess.
Secondly, the writer mentions that hydrogen-based fuel cells can reduce air pollution since it does not pollute air like the oil. The professor, on the other hand, says that it is true that using this technology would not cause any pollution, however, producing of it will definitely create greenhouse gases. She continues by adding that the factories and the purification process without any doubts will result in air pollution.
Lastly, the reading claims that cars that will use this new fuel will be more efficient and it will compete with the current car fuel's economically. The reading also mentions that overall this new fuel will be more budget-friendly. On the contrary, the lecturer thinks that since the metals which need to be used for this new fuel are highly expensive overall, this new innovation would be more costly than today's fuel. She also adds that replacing these expensive metals with their cheap versions is not possible.
Overall, the professor definitely has many doubts about the point which made by the author on the topic of hydrogen-based fuel.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-29 | negooo | 80 | view |
| 2022-10-02 | Kalyani_tekade_24 | 60 | view |
| 2022-10-02 | 1ms19ec133 | 80 | view |
| 2022-09-04 | jimHsu | 80 | view |
| 2022-08-21 | dnudlyjgtnudbphwev | 73 | view |
- People will buy a product if it has quality or fulfil their needs There is no need for advertisement To what extent do you agree or disagree 88
- franchisement 80
- Online shopping is increasing significantly What effects might be on the environment and the types of jobs which are required for it 73
- People learn things from those at their own level such as fellow students or co workers than from those at a higher level such as teachers or supervisors 73
- Some people think that young people should go to university to further their education while others think they should be encouraged to work to serve society Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 145, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...e main benefits of this new technology. The professor from the listening passage di...
^^^
Line 7, column 367, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'innovation'.
Suggestion: innovation
...fuel are highly expensive overall, this new innovation would be more costly than todays fuel. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, for instance, first of all, it is true, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 22.412803532 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1665.0 1373.03311258 121% => OK
No of words: 318.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2358490566 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81284869767 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509433962264 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 503.1 419.366225166 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.299363356 49.2860985944 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0625 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.875 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 7.06452816374 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 4.33554083885 231% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0529504290817 0.272083759551 19% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0190145259256 0.0996497079465 19% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0225991478587 0.0662205650399 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0281694454198 0.162205337803 17% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0309583691771 0.0443174109184 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 63.6247240618 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.