Chaco building usage
Both reading passage and lecturer discusses the evidence and prediction about whether the Chaco building was used as apartment, container or even cermonical center. Hovewer, there are no exact prediction about Chaco but, reading passage mentionad three possible usage with supporting evidences and examples. Albiet, the lecturer had strick contrast with reading passage by denying the prediction with following three statement.
First of all, reading passage hold an idea that it may be used as an apartment for hundred of people linked to the evidence that there were same sturctured apartment at Taos where many peole lived for many centuries. On the contrary, lecturer believes that even the outside looks same as apartment, the inside of Chaco is not suitable for living. Henceforth he gives an example that if there were large number of people lived in inside, there should be that amounts of fireplaces, but evidence showed less amount, which highlighted the idea that it was not build for residential.
Secondly, the second theory passage hold is that it may be used as food container for long periods because of the of suitable sizes. And again, the idea contrasted with lecturer that evidence showed less container which loosen the prediction that it was used as food container.
Lastly, excavation evidence revealed that there were large number of broken pods leading to prediction that it was used in cermonial activity because such cermony is familier in native Americans. Hovewer, lecturer provide an explantion that it was not used as that way because excavation evidence was not only broken vase or pots, despite the pods, there were sand, aggregate, construction and building materials.
In sum, the lecturer disagree with statement that reading passage holds, he furtherly concluded that Chace was used as trash contraction due to the excavation evidences found in area around Chance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-07 | Sina-ss | 76 | view |
| 2019-08-21 | tamir052222 | 73 | view |
| 2016-08-08 | shirin Mozaffari | 86 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. 90
- Some people think that scientist make the most important contribution to society. Others thins that the contribution of artists are most important. Which one do you agree with? 70
- The number of children that read books for fun has dropped dramatically in recent years What are the reasons for this How can we encourage children to read more 59
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site.Use specific reasons and examples t 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 84, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...that it may be used as an apartment for hundred of people linked to the evidence that t...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 347, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Henceforth,
...de of Chaco is not suitable for living. Henceforth he gives an example that if there were ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, lastly, look, may, second, secondly, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 5.01324503311 459% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1605.0 1373.03311258 117% => OK
No of words: 303.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29702970297 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59783985397 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498349834983 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 510.3 419.366225166 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.985693498 49.2860985944 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.909090909 110.228320801 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5454545455 21.698381199 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.09090909091 7.06452816374 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116943632545 0.272083759551 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0514645280551 0.0996497079465 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664162594515 0.0662205650399 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0585600959117 0.162205337803 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0677902217376 0.0443174109184 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.3589403974 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 53.8541721854 66% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.0289183223 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.