colonization on asteroids
The reading and the passage are both about the excellence and advantages of colonization on asteroids instead of moon or Mars. Actually, the author provides three advantages regarding asteroid colonization. On the other hand, the professor is not convinced of this and casts doubt on each of the theories presented in the reading. Point the other side of the story, the speaker is of the opinion that living on asteroids is not as possible as mentioned in the passage and each of the theories has downsides.
To begin with, the author asserts that landing on asteroids is safer and much easier since it has low gravity. The article mentions that owing to this lower gravity, space crafts are capable of carrying less fuel for the trip. This specific argument is challenged by the professor. Contrastly, the speaker argues that this low gravity provides risks for the astronauts. According the him, low gravity give rise to several health problems such as decreasing muscles’ mass and bone density.
Secondly, the article disputes that some of asteroids are rich in precious metal and stones and mining these elements that are scares on earth is profitable. On the other hand, the professor opposes this notion by claiming that other prohibiting factors should be considered regarding mining these elements. First of all, the speaker alludes to the cost of supporting such colonies and transporting tools to asteroid or transporting goods to Earth which are expensive processes. Additionally, the speaker states that providing large amount of these elements on Earth increases the available supply which, relatively, lead to not achieving the market goals.
Finally, the writer disputes that some of the asteroids are close to the Earth which make it easier to get to them. Also, the article states that such trips will take less time and are, consequently, more affordable. In contrast, the professor’s stance is that although some of asteroids are closer to Earth, however, since their orbits may be unusual, they can go away from Earth for great distances after a while. Therefore, hardly space crafts can return to Earth if the asteroid go too far from Earth, even more than Mars.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-16 | degew59415@eryod.com | 93 | view |
| 2023-05-28 | Atharva_Bhide188 | 80 | view |
| 2023-05-28 | Soham Chinchalkar | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-20 | Hibahtabbaa | 80 | view |
| 2023-04-30 | Hibahtabbaa | 81 | view |
- do you agree or this agree with the following statement people are initially leader and do not need to learn to be a leader 90
- decreasing salinity of the lake 70
- colonization on asteroids 80
- advantages of franchising 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 382, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'him'?
Suggestion: the; him
...es risks for the astronauts. According the him, low gravity give rise to several healt...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 37, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'some of', you should use 'the' ('some of the asteroids') or simply say ''some asteroids''.
Suggestion: some of the asteroids; some asteroids
.... Secondly, the article disputes that some of asteroids are rich in precious metal and stones a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 35, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ls. Finally, the writer disputes that some of the asteroids are close to the Earth which ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 271, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'some of', you should use 'the' ('some of the asteroids') or simply say ''some asteroids''.
Suggestion: some of the asteroids; some asteroids
...the professor’s stance is that although some of asteroids are closer to Earth, however, since the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, consequently, finally, first, however, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, in contrast, such as, first of all, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 30.3222958057 162% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1834.0 1373.03311258 134% => OK
No of words: 359.0 270.72406181 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10863509749 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66218914242 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 145.348785872 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529247910864 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 419.366225166 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 14.0 8.23620309051 170% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8481760335 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.882352941 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1176470588 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7647058824 7.06452816374 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229515918575 0.272083759551 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0707483983624 0.0996497079465 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0830218439956 0.0662205650399 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132451946024 0.162205337803 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0844853224619 0.0443174109184 191% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 63.6247240618 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.