Communal online encyclopedias and its advantages and disadvantages.
The article states that there are several issues about communal online encyclopedias and offers three reasons which make them less valuable than traditional methods. However, the lecturer explains that online encyclopedias data are valid and refutes the authors’ reasons.
First, the reading claims that the information which are provided by contributors have a shortage of academic materials. The professor rebuts this point by saying that it is probable that traditional methods have faults but most information on the internet have a strong references which make them reliable and easy to correct.
Second, the article posits that it is probable that reckless users or hackers get opportunities to change and eliminate the information. However, the professor says that the most data on the internet are protected by some strategies such as formatting readings to be read-only, as a result nobody can change them. The lecturer also mentions that there are people and organizations who monitors the data and detect every suspicious change.
Third, the author of the reading states that the communal encyclopedia mainly is dedicated to frequently topics deeply. The professor, on the other hand, feels that there is no limitation of space on the online communal encyclopedia, and because of this, the variety of articles is plethora. According to the professor this diversity is a brilliant advantageof the online communal encyclopedia.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-16 | TiOluwani97 | 87 | view |
| 2023-07-18 | M. MEHRABI KERMANI | 80 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | keisham | 83 | view |
| 2023-04-05 | Dat_Nguyen | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-28 | MotherAstronaut | 85 | view |
- Some people prefer to travel alone Others like to travel in groups Which do you think is the best way to travel Use specific reasons and examples to explain your choice 70
- Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small number of people. Some people say that government should spend public money on saving these languages, while others believe that would be a waste of money. Discuss both th 61
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Technology has made children less creative than they were before 87
- Some people think that can learn better by themselves than with a teacher. Others think that it isalways better to have a teacher. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and develop your essay. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?“In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.” 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 210, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'encyclopedias'' or 'encyclopedia's'?
Suggestion: encyclopedias'; encyclopedia's
...ever, the lecturer explains that online encyclopedias data are valid and refutes the authors&...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 271, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'reference'?
Suggestion: reference
...formation on the internet have a strong references which make them reliable and easy to co...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, second, so, third, as for, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 30.3222958057 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1227.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 222.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52702702703 5.08290768461 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96026837711 2.5805825403 115% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567567567568 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 389.7 419.366225166 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.574376433 49.2860985944 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.7 110.228320801 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2 21.698381199 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.3 7.06452816374 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199074933256 0.272083759551 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0911404744121 0.0996497079465 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0962135304637 0.0662205650399 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128131665919 0.162205337803 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130809030417 0.0443174109184 295% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.3589403974 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.8541721854 60% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.0289183223 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.2367328918 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.42419426049 113% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.