Critics say that current voting systems used in the United States are inefficient and often lead to the inaccurate counting of votes. Miscounts can be especially damaging if an election is closely contested. Those critics would like the traditional systems to be replaced with far more efficient and trustworthy computerized voting systems. In traditional voting, one major source of inaccuracy is that people accidentally vote for the wrong candidate. Voters usually have to find the name of their candidate on a large sheet of paper containing many names—the ballot—and make a small mark next to that name. People with poor eyesight can easily mark the wrong name. The computerized voting machines have an easy-to-use touch-screen technology: to cast a vote, a voter needs only to touch the candidate’s name on the screen to record a vote for that candidate; voters can even have the computer magnify the name for easier viewing. Another major problem with old voting systems is that they rely heavily on people to count the votes. Officials must often count up the votes one by one, going through every ballot and recording the vote. Since they have to deal with thousands of ballots, it is almost inevitable that they will make mistakes. If an error is detected, a long and expensive recount has to take place. In contrast, computerized systems remove the possibility of human error, since all the vote counting is done quickly and automatically by the computers. Finally some people say it is too risky to implement complicated voting technology nationwide. But without giving it a thought, governments and individuals alike trust other complex computer technology every day to be perfectly accurate in banking transactions as well as in the communication of highly sensitive information.
Voting system a significant issue for all countries. The authorities are dicussing about two obtions; continue to use traditional system or switch to the computerized voting system. In the reading part, the author is supporting the idea of switching to the computerized voting system by emphasizing the some main points.
The text claims, in computerized voting system there is no possiibility to wrong vote, the voter needs just touch the candidates’ name on the screen. Although, by computerized voting system there is no necessary to one-by-one counting for the votes and this will be the end of the wrong countings.At the end, the author is adding instead of the trust individuals, trust to a complex competer which can do banking transactions accurately is more preferable.
After that, in the lecture the professor oppose the article by stating some people who do not use the computers regularly, according to the lecturer these people can cause so much problem in the computerized voting system. Lecturer also adding, there are questions about the counting process with computers because if something wrong on the computer system the error will be unexceptable. As a final point, according to the lecturer, to trust the computerized voting system, it should be used more often and improved by this way like in the banking and communication systems. The computers did not begin as perfect assistants, they had improved by time. So, the computerized voting system has to be developped before to use them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-30 | Shimakaze514 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-30 | Shimakaze514 | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | Vivekh0514 | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-30 | toshaklg | 80 | view |
| 2018-10-27 | Ram sharma | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?A teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to use printed material such as books and articles to do research than it is to use the internet. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Do you agree or disagree?your job has more effect on your happiness than your social life does. 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?A teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught. 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to use printed material such as books and articles to do research than it is to use the internet. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 304, Rule ID: THE_SOME_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'same'?
Suggestion: same
...erized voting system by emphasizing the some main points. The text claims, in com...
^^^^
Line 3, column 303, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: At
... will be the end of the wrong countings.At the end, the author is adding instead o...
^^
Line 5, column 607, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... systems. The computers did not begin as perfect assistants, they had improved by...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 12.0772626932 25% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 22.412803532 31% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1278.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 245.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21632653061 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02604548385 2.5805825403 117% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54693877551 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 401.4 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 2.5761589404 349% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.1778359332 49.2860985944 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.8 110.228320801 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 21.698381199 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.9 7.06452816374 27% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236574457296 0.272083759551 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110826134558 0.0996497079465 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525698495281 0.0662205650399 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168311972375 0.162205337803 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0299208727567 0.0443174109184 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.