declining of yellow cedars
Both passage and lecture discuss the declining of the yellow cedar, a common tree species in North America during more than a century before now. The reading provides some hypotheses explaining this declining and in the contrast, the professor denies each of these hypotheses. He states that all assumptions are insufficient and there are not exact and true knowledge about the reason of declining such tree.
First, the reading talk about the probably attack of tree by insect parasites, specifically the carder bark beetle. It claims that they eat wood and there are much reported attack of them to this kind of tree. In the opposite the professor refutes this by saying that yellow carder tree have a chemical which act as poisoner for beetles and other insects. These insects will be killed by this chemical which is the reason of finding many beetles around the tree.
Second, according to passage another good candidate for such declining is brown bears. They ate the tree bark by clawing at the cedars. It states that the cedar bark prepared sugar as much as wild berries. The professor disagrees with this by saying that many yellow cedars extinct at some areas without existence of any bears, so it is impossible to think about bears as the cause of decreasing the number of cedars.
Third, the reading provides another factor which is a good candidate for declining of cedar in its opinion, graduate change of climate. This factor influence on the root systems of cedar, start growing in the late winter and following harm of frozen climate. The professor refutes this by explaining that the reading does not consider an important factor, lower revolution. He says that warm climate is more detrimental and harmful for cedar trees in comparison to freeze climate, so it is an evidence which denies this hypothesis.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-20 | Shayooooon | 83 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Parents should allow children to make their own choices rather than determine their children s future for them 87
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents do not understand their children so well as parents did 50 years ago. 70
- modified trees and natural ones 80
- an ingenious weapon 68
- it is more important to keep old friends than make new friends 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, third, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1523.0 1373.03311258 111% => OK
No of words: 307.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96091205212 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46849666657 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524429967427 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 419.366225166 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6596453633 49.2860985944 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.533333333 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4666666667 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.46666666667 7.06452816374 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 4.45695364238 224% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262106368175 0.272083759551 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0844943097775 0.0996497079465 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0811223323774 0.0662205650399 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175260051305 0.162205337803 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.097253493348 0.0443174109184 219% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.