dinosaurs were endotherms because
some fossils are found in Polar Regions
their legs were underneath their bodies
there are canals in their bone structure
The reading claims that dinosaurs were endotherms and provides three reasons in order to prove this idea. However, the lecturer explains that these baseless ideas are not completely right and disprove all of the author's suggestions. In the follwoing, the rationale behind the professor's lecture will be elaborated.
First of all, the essay agrees that dinosaurs were endotherms because some fossils of them have been found in polar regions. On the other hand, the professor overthrows this idea. she confirms that polars in that period of time were not as cold as today. Moreover, she concedes that in cold circumstances dinosaurs could have migrated to warmer places or easily hibernated like many other creatures.
Secondly, the reading posits the author's idea owing to having legs under dinosaurs' bodies, but the teacher opposes this claim insomuch as she upholds that the position of the legs are mostly for supporting the extensive weights and sizes of dinosaurs' bodies; therefore, they did not have to run like other endotherms.
Third, the passage thinks that the bone structure is another supportive idea for this claim. Although the professors endorses this idea, she announces that they also had "growth rings". This is a solid proof that they were not endotherms inasmuch as these rings are structured in grwoing periods of an animal. When the weather is cold, the growing of the non-endotherm animal stops or decreases in pace, and when the weather is fine the pace of growing in that animal is fast. However, endotherms grow rapidly in a same pace whether the weather is cold or not.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-09 | Seyed Armin Mirhosseini | 80 | view |
- voynich manuscript origin 88
- is it better to get news from sources with similar views to yours or from those with different views from yours 83
- TPO 20 independent agree or not successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well 85
- in many organizations perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages 80
- TPO 51 integrated elephants leave they herds when they want to die The have artistic abilities They are afraid mice 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 202, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...s are not completely right and disprove all of the authors suggestions. In the follwoing, ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 181, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...nd, the professor overthrows this idea. she confirms that polars in that period of ...
^^^
Line 5, column 214, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... idea. she confirms that polars in that period of time were not as cold as today. Moreover, sh...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 34, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
.... Secondly, the reading posits the authors idea owing to having legs under dinosau...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, as to, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1359.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 263.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16730038023 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61861547154 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570342205323 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.3567900089 49.2860985944 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.538461538 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2307692308 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.84615384615 7.06452816374 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197022468946 0.272083759551 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0729152536925 0.0996497079465 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0882833141449 0.0662205650399 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11549810798 0.162205337803 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0625890986068 0.0443174109184 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.