Topic: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should be paid according to how much their students learn. Give specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
The educational system of each country has a series of policy which echoes its academic status. There have been mixed reactions to teachers wages rate, and many academic people think that it is not a good way to improve knowledge level by allocation teachers salaries based on how much their students learn. I tend to agree with the idea that teachers’ income must be a reflection of his student’s learning. Following lines further describe my view about teachers salary and students learning.
The first and foremost reason is that this can make teachers work harder. If teachers understand that their salary will be paid based on their performance in the class, which is the result of students learning, they tend to work harder and do their best to have a better income. My father’s story is an interesting example in this case. He is a teacher in elementary school and teaches to third-grade students. Until 10 years ago our county’s educational system did not divide teachers based on payments. But after that, a law was enacted which classified teachers based on an annual evaluation, and the better the teacher the more money he receives. After that my father started to read lots of sources about how to teach kids more efficiently and after 5 years our income was doubled. His students were all among top students in the school. As can be seen, this was a practical rule which benefited both students and teachers.
The second reason that should be taken into account is it that teachers try to motivate students to study more and more. This can lead to students improvements and consequently teachers economic advantage. My experience is a compelling example. In the same year that I pointed out above, My teachers were also affected by the law. He tried to promote us to study more and also checked our assignments. He awarded us if we were good in the class. He bought many gifts for my classmates and that year our class had a great development.
According to the reasons mentioned above, teachers should be paid based on their performance in the class which means students improvement. That is because in this way they work harder to learn new methods and also they tend to motivate their students to learn more and more.
- Did bees (a type of insect) exist on Earth as early as 200 million years ago? Such a theory is supported by the discovery of very old fossil structures that resemble bee nests. The structures have been found inside 200- million-year-old fossilized trees i 78
- TPO 44 80
- TPO INTEGRATED 51 3
- TPO-47 - Integrated Writing Task Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered 78
- TPO-22 - Integrated Writing Task Ethanol fuel, made from plants such as corn and sugar cane, has been advocated by some people as an alternative to gasoline in the United States. However, many critics argue that ethanol is not a good replacement for gasol 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 447, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...warded us if we were good in the class. He bought many gifts for my classmates and...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 10.4613686534 201% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 7.30242825607 233% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 22.412803532 236% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 30.3222958057 171% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2042.0 1373.03311258 149% => OK
No of words: 416.0 270.72406181 154% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90865384615 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.04702891845 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69090687287 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 145.348785872 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 615.6 419.366225166 147% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 3.25607064018 399% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 13.0662251656 191% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.6738090851 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.68 110.228320801 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.64 21.698381199 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.12 7.06452816374 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 4.33554083885 369% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.400450540075 0.272083759551 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115487401586 0.0996497079465 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135265094169 0.0662205650399 204% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.330009147379 0.162205337803 203% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.319447601019 0.0443174109184 721% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.3589403974 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 63.6247240618 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.