Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
Nowadays, it's hard to find a person who is not familiar with new technology. Technology has become one of our essential tools for living. Despite some harmful effects on us, we can't ignore the convenience that it brings to our life. Children aren't exceptional. Technology has changed the processes of their learning, how to make friends and so many other things. Personally, I don't agree that these days children have become less creative, unlike I believe they have become more creative. I will explain my point of view in the following paragraphs:
First, all new things which become a part of our life take time to get used to them. Newborn children from the first days of their life see mobile phones, laptops, and all new technologies. They grow with these and we should just teach them the correct way of using them. So, they can't be harmful to them and not affect their abilities like ingenuity and creativity.
Second, some companies design particular applications for children of different ages, a child can increase abilities in different areas. Some application by using artificial intelligence can predict the special ability of a child and their aptitude will discover so soon.
On the other hand, maybe the form of games which children now use is different from the way it used to be, but these games also designed by some professionals which try to increase the creativity of the child.
Last but not least, families play an important role in this content. They should control the accessibilities of the child to the network, also the time which child spend with mobiles or even TVs should be limited. So with controlling a child can take the best of it.
In conclusion, in my opinion, every new technology has both negative and positive aspects it depends on us use which aspect. Children by using technology correctly can increase their ingenuity and creativity.
- Summarise the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage Private collectors have been selling and buying fossils the petrified remains of ancient organisms ever since the eighteenth 80
- Question Summarise the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage Every year forest fires and severe storms cause a great deal of damage to forests in the northwestern United States 73
- Question Summarise the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage Car manufacturers and governments have been eagerly seeking a replacement for the automobile s main source of power 83
- Summarise the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage In an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices an international organization started issuing certifica 80
- Summarise the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage A recent study reveals that people especially young people are reading far less literature novels plays and poems than they u 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 178, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... Despite some harmful effects on us, we cant ignore the convenience that it brings t...
^^^^
Line 1, column 243, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...ce that it brings to our life. Children arent exceptional. Technology has changed the...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 378, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...and so many other things. Personally, I dont agree that these days children have bec...
^^^^
Line 2, column 282, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...the correct way of using them. So, they cant be harmful to them and not affect their...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, so, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 22.412803532 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1569.0 1373.03311258 114% => OK
No of words: 318.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93396226415 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70078923458 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556603773585 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 419.366225166 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 8.23620309051 12% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.4803240579 49.2860985944 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.1666666667 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 21.698381199 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 7.06452816374 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.09492273731 147% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148833435449 0.272083759551 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0478285984471 0.0996497079465 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0311944831072 0.0662205650399 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0775046520102 0.162205337803 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029673072051 0.0443174109184 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.