Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In this progressive and sophisticated world where we live in, human beings have been looking for best ways to have social prestige and valued by society. Individuals' values have been changed dramatically during the decades. Many people believe teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than today. However some others have an opposite point of view. In my vantage point, teachers were more valued in the past. In what follows, I will elaborate on my perspective.
First, it is significant to be mentioned, with the advent of technology many tasks have been made easier so people do not need teachers in order to be an educated person. To be more specific, teachers were not appreciated by society any more since people can learn anything by searching on internet or watching educational CDs on their computers. In the past, society members used to be depend on teachers to learn lessons and solving problems, but nowadays individuals have access to many resources to consolidate their skills and enhance their knowledge. For instance, my little daughter watches Youtube videos and learn mathematics skills and solve her problems in mathematics by online media groups, thus she does not need her teacher. As a result she, as a small society, does not respect and appreciate her teacher as well as the past.
Another reason which deserves some attention here is that, due to economic critical, many teachers concern about their financial status, so they do not concentrate on their teaching methods. consequently, they were not valued by society members anymore. To put it in other words, teachers in the past were more enthusiastic about teaching and use appealing techniques to attract students' attention. Conversely, these days teachers have been struggling with financial issues, so they do not use their full focus on teaching, and do this job only for money. Hence, the teachers were not appreciated by society.
From what has been discussed above, we can safely reach the conclusion that, teachers were more valued by society in the past. Because, nowadays, there are more beneficial ways for learning and society members use them instead of teachers. Besides, teachers were more avid about teaching in the past, that was valuable.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 48
- The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people 70
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?•Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.•Wait until the class or meeting 73
- grades encourage students to learn 66
- Governments should focus their budgets more on environmental protection than on economic development 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 322, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...lued by society in the past than today. However some others have an opposite point of v...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 192, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Consequently
... concentrate on their teaching methods. consequently, they were not valued by society member...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, conversely, first, hence, however, if, look, so, thus, well, for instance, as a result, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 10.4613686534 201% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 30.3222958057 191% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1897.0 1373.03311258 138% => OK
No of words: 369.0 270.72406181 136% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14092140921 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68287208069 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 145.348785872 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539295392954 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 590.4 419.366225166 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 8.23620309051 12% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 2.5761589404 311% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0481345511 49.2860985944 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8421052632 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4210526316 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.47368421053 7.06452816374 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314801036765 0.272083759551 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122750428588 0.0996497079465 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0959315469258 0.0662205650399 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216106242394 0.162205337803 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0462421027203 0.0443174109184 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 63.6247240618 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.