Ecocertified wood for American people
In the lecture, the professor makes several points that argue against those presented in the passage about the advantages of a wood eco-certified for American companies.
Firstly, it said that it's a wrong affirmation that consumers don't value an eco-certification label, they know the difference between a claim the companies do for their products and a claim by independent certification agencies, besides the Americans value more agencies with an international reputation.
Then, the passage affirms that the wood with eco-certification will be more expensive than woods without them, the professor says that it’s correct but the difference will be minimal, just 5%. Besides, the consumers, are increasingly convinced of the value of taking care of the environment.
Finally, the passage argues that American companies sell their products mostly in the U.S. and Americans are satisfied with their merchandise, but the lecture differs at this point because American consumers are beginning to appreciate an eco-certified product and will turn to foreign companies if they cannot get it locally.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-09 | funmiphysio | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-28 | Kalyani_tekade_24 | 75 | view |
| 2022-05-12 | harvey_elliot | 73 | view |
| 2020-08-11 | Joanne Chang | 76 | view |
| 2020-04-20 | Sara_amz_ | 76 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fied for American companies. Firstly, it said that its a wrong affirmation tha...
^^
Line 3, column 24, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...an companies. Firstly, it said that its a wrong affirmation that consumers dont...
^^^
Line 3, column 63, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... its a wrong affirmation that consumers dont value an eco-certification label, they ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 189, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he lecture differs at this point because American consumers are beginning to appr...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, finally, first, firstly, if, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 30.3222958057 63% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 940.0 1373.03311258 68% => OK
No of words: 167.0 270.72406181 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62874251497 5.08290768461 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 4.04702891845 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19543984663 2.5805825403 124% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 145.348785872 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.610778443114 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 419.366225166 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 13.0662251656 38% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 21.2450331126 155% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 85.6191567349 49.2860985944 174% => OK
Chars per sentence: 188.0 110.228320801 171% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.4 21.698381199 154% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2 7.06452816374 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181441917679 0.272083759551 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0954680391784 0.0996497079465 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638160023279 0.0662205650399 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116545954251 0.162205337803 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0491899483435 0.0443174109184 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.8 13.3589403974 163% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 21.06 53.8541721854 39% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 5.55761589404 234% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.5 11.0289183223 168% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.97 12.2367328918 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 63.6247240618 63% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 20.5 10.7273730684 191% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.498013245 145% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.2008830022 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.