ecotourism environment
The Proffesor claims that eco-turism, even though is a good replacement for other ways of development, has negative effects.
The author states that this kind of turism would reduce the harm to the environment, and gives the example of a rainforest, whose living creatures aren’t affected by this development form. But the professor refutes this by explaining that the government cannot assure that illegal huntting, or logging won’t happen. Furthermore, the roads built for the tourist could be used for this heynous activities.
The writer also provides the argument that green-turism would provide jobs and better life conditions for locals. The speaker claims that they will get more jobs, but this jobs wil have the lowest wages- for the highest paying jobs will be taken by foreigners. Moreover, the native culture woud be disrupted, because tourist will force their beliefs and customs into this places.
To summarize, the lecturer explains that eco-turism does not only have good consequences, but also has negative ones. He uses the instances the author wrote about to explain some negative effects: The environment illegal damaging, the local life endangerment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 103, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...placement for other ways of development, has negative effects. The author states...
^^
Line 3, column 181, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (wil) must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...y will get more jobs, but this jobs wil have the lowest wages- for the highest payin...
^^^^
Line 3, column 367, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ll force their beliefs and customs into this places. To summarize, the lecturer exp...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 30.3222958057 36% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1003.0 1373.03311258 73% => OK
No of words: 184.0 270.72406181 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45108695652 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 4.04702891845 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7607786274 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.657608695652 0.540411800872 122% => OK
syllable_count: 302.4 419.366225166 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.51434878587 330% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.5335933985 49.2860985944 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 111.444444444 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4444444444 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 7.06452816374 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0256057969179 0.272083759551 9% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0116390192602 0.0996497079465 12% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.032920117781 0.0662205650399 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0180870948498 0.162205337803 11% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313277672411 0.0443174109184 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.2367328918 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.42419426049 117% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.