ecotourism
The audio clip and the reading are both about the impact of eco-tourism in society, the passage states that eco-tourism is a good option, because it improves the life of the local people, the animals, and the plants, besides the eco-tourism improves the conservation of natural areas. On the other hand, the audio clip states that this kind of tourism has not only a good impact on the society, actually it has an important negative impact.
The passage states that this kind of tourism has a good impact on the local people because it creates new jobs for the people who live nearby, on the other hand, the woman on the audio clip, states that this fact also has a negative point, because even they need more jobs, these ones are taken by people who don’t live nearby and this fact implies a social pollution.
Also, the passage points that the eco-tourism helps conservation of natural areas, but the woman who was talking on the audio clip states that it is not true, because even the eco-tourism does not imply the pollution that other kinds of tourism do, it requires infrastructure and implies water pollution, air pollution, cutting down trees and hunting.
Finally, the eco-tourism has many positive points like the conservation of the natural parks and the animals, but it also has a negative impact that we have to consider.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 275, Rule ID: THESE_ONES[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'these' instead.
Suggestion: these
...oint, because even they need more jobs, these ones are taken by people who don't live...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 355, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'social pollution'.
Suggestion: social pollution
...pos;t live nearby and this fact implies a social pollution. Also, the passage points that the ec...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, but, finally, if, so, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1118.0 1373.03311258 81% => OK
No of words: 231.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83982683983 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48859394628 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 145.348785872 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.450216450216 0.540411800872 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 351.0 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 13.0662251656 38% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 46.0 21.2450331126 217% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 90.2520913885 49.2860985944 183% => OK
Chars per sentence: 223.6 110.228320801 203% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 46.2 21.698381199 213% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 14.6 7.06452816374 207% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 24.5 13.3589403974 183% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.25 53.8541721854 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.1 11.0289183223 182% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.68 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 63.6247240618 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.7273730684 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 20.4 10.498013245 194% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.