Effects of Deforestation in the global scenario
The lecture and the passage talk about the effects of deforestation on our globe. While the passage discusses the positive effects of deforestation on our economy, the lecturer focuses on the negative effects. The lecturer gives us counter arguments for the point put forth by the passage. Let us discuss the same below.
Firstly, the passage talks about how deforestation can benefit the rapidly growing population by providing more land for the cultivation of crops and the breeding of livestock. The lecture argues against this notion, pointing out that there are several other ways to cultivate crops like the hydroponic method of cultivation and cutting down trees is not an effective means to preserve rainforests.
Secondly, the passage points out that deforestation is essential for creating residential areas for the expanding population. Whereas, the lecturer states that destroying the forest land to create residential areas is only a short-term economic gain. Thus arguing that this action can be inconsequential in the long term.
Lastly, the passage states that deforestation is a means of living for people in several developing nations and curbing deforestation can affect their livelihood. However, The lecturer specifies that these people earn low wages and are not benefiting from deforestation in the first place.
In conclusion, the passage talks about the advantageous nature of deforestation on our population and the need for it, but the lecturer opposes this notion by stating evidence to prove her case.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-20 | HRBM | 76 | view |
| 2022-11-09 | Nina Tsarevich | 80 | view |
| 2022-09-11 | m_aalaei | 80 | view |
| 2022-09-11 | m_aalaei | 76 | view |
| 2021-02-05 | Safa Arshad | 80 | view |
- Medical technology can increase humans life expectancy Is it a blessing or a curse 80
- The reading and the lecture are both about forest fires and whether or not they should be deliberately suppressed The author of the reading believes that it is beneficial to stop such fires from occurring The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made in the 80
- Some people believe that car free days are effective ways to reduce air pollution However others argue that there are other ways that are more effective Discuss both views and give your own opinion 70
- some say that music is as important as other subjects in schools especially at the preschool level Do you agree or disagree Give your opinion 77
- Some feel that governments should prioritize healthcare instead of other important areas To what extent do you agree or disagree And give examples 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 356, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[2]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...ltivation and cutting down trees is not an effective means to preserve rainforests. Secon...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 127, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ial areas for the expanding population. Whereas, the lecturer states that destroying th...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, thus, whereas, while, as for, in conclusion, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.01324503311 279% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1306.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 239.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46443514644 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98588850935 2.5805825403 116% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560669456067 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2574329711 49.2860985944 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.833333333 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9166666667 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.25 7.06452816374 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166135025154 0.272083759551 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0708863344803 0.0996497079465 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0692612401173 0.0662205650399 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0977737295243 0.162205337803 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480234926967 0.0443174109184 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.8541721854 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.2367328918 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.