Endotherms are animals such as modern birds and mammals that keep their body temperatures constant. For instance, humans are endotherms and maintain an internal temperature of 37°C, no matter whether the environment is warm or cold. Because dinosaurs wer

In contrast of the reading passage, which makes evidences that dinosaurs were endotherms, the lecture of the professor explains that that positions are not ensuring that dinosaurs were endotherms. professor gives support and evidence on her side.

First of all, bolster their conclusion, reading passage provides information that dinosaurs fossil are found in the polar region where most of the endotherms lived. However, professor interpolates this point that this region which we call now as a 'polar region' actually were warmer that time. Additionally, when winter was coming dinosaurs migrated their living place to another. So it is tough to believe that reading statement.

Secondly, professor illustrates that only leg position never gives any evidence that dinosaurs were endotherms because more weight also needs the support of legs. If legs position are outside of their body, it is not possible to maintain body weight. Not only for running purposes but also for maintaining body weight, dinosaurs need strong legs.

Last evidence are provided by the reading passage that is the presence of Haversian canals in the body of dinosaurs also negate by professor counter-presentation. It is natural to grow in quick way during warmer weather than cold temperature. As well as strong bone structures needed for their quick growth. Only this factor never concludes that dinosaurs were endotherms.

In conclusion, each and every points which are made by the reading passage are full of flaws and ill-evidence. Professor criticize every points and negates all point with logical thinking which terminates that dinosaurs are not endotherms animals.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 4, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
In contrast of the reading passage, which makes evi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 198, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Professor
...nsuring that dinosaurs were endotherms. professor gives support and evidence on her side....
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 83, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'dinosaurs'' or 'dinosaur's'?
Suggestion: dinosaurs'; dinosaur's
...ading passage provides information that dinosaurs fossil are found in the polar region wh...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 122, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'criticizes'.
Suggestion: criticizes
...ll of flaws and ill-evidence. Professor criticize every points and negates all point with...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, in conclusion, in contrast, as well as, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 12.0772626932 157% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1405.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 256.0 270.72406181 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48828125 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8177657953 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546875 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.23620309051 12% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.1835761705 49.2860985944 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.6666666667 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0666666667 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.06666666667 7.06452816374 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137617555371 0.272083759551 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0496917532221 0.0996497079465 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0398308255909 0.0662205650399 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0764622422127 0.162205337803 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0410198995786 0.0443174109184 93% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.8541721854 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.2367328918 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.