Essay topics: TPO-52. Integrated Writing Task. Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made in the reading passage.

Essay topics:

Essay topics: TPO-52. Integrated Writing Task. Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made in the reading passage.

The reading explains three reasons that Asteroids is a suitable place and best option for human to establish colonies and live in this plant. However, the professor believes that the reading's reasons are not practical and rejects them as follows.
Firstly, the reading claims that Asteroids has lower gravity comparing with other plants; therefore, a spacecraft can not only carry much equipment, but also easily take off and back. Controversy, the professor points out that the less gravity is hazardous for the health of astronauts, because it can result in health problems such as muscle and bone lose.
Secondly, the reading reckons that Asteroids can be profitable for human, since there are plenty of valuable materials such as gold and platinum. In contrast, the professor affirms that the mining and transferring these materials are extremely expensive. Furthermore, valuable metals such as gold and platinum are valuable, because they are rare, but after transferring to earth the coast of them would increase due to the large amount of them in the earth.
Eventually, the reading claims that going to Asteroids is easier that other plants, because it is near Erath's orbit. While, the professor reckons that the distance of Asteroids is not stable and they travel much farther the Earth. Therefore, returning spacecraft would be very hard, although a spacecraft can easily go to this plant.

Votes
Average: 0.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-21 cccmmm 83 view
2019-12-22 NIMA SAEEDI 85 view
2019-12-16 NIMA SAEEDI 75 view
2019-12-15 NIMA SAEEDI 78 view
2019-11-01 Aydin94 3 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, in contrast, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1180.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 225.0 270.72406181 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24444444444 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62228248518 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546666666667 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 350.1 419.366225166 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.25165562914 399% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4384959021 49.2860985944 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9 7.06452816374 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0777710852884 0.272083759551 29% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0311879033654 0.0996497079465 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0152775241318 0.0662205650399 23% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0479539253301 0.162205337803 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00711870371269 0.0443174109184 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.