Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made in the reading passage. Sending humans to asteroid
The reading and lecture are both about the colonization on asteroids, which some think sending humans to an asteroid maybe is easier than sending to planets. The author of reading believes that there are suitable conditions for living on asteroids. The lecture challenges the statement made by the author. He is of the opinion that these properties are not good for colonization.
First of all, the author suggests that asteroids have a low gravity, so there is no force for pulling the spacecraft to the surface. It is important because landing and takeoff are safer than on the Moon and spacecraft can carry more equipment. This statement is challenged by the lecture. Professor says that low gravity causes people to lose their muscle mass and reduce bone density. Therefore, settling on the asteroid has negative impacts on the health in long-term.
Secondly, the writer contends that asteroids have valuable metals such as gold which they are not found on Earth. The article notes the colonists could extract raw materials and sending them back to earth. The lecture, however, rebuts this by asserting that colonization and transporting are expensive, therefore, this decreases merit of the asteroid to doing this work. Moreover, excavations in large quantities cause minerals to have a low price in markets because there are many of them.
Finally, it is stated in the article that asteroids stay in the site which reaches to them is easy. The author establishes that asteroids be close enough to Earth, so they are the perfect option for inhabitation. The lecture, on the other hand, posits that get to asteroids has no problem, but get back to Earth is difficult. The professor mentions that asteroids can orbit also move away from Earth for a long distance. Consequently, the asteroid not stays close to Earth and we have a challenge for getting back to Earth.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-15 | NIMA SAEEDI | 78 | view |
- You have long been friends with someone. If they do something that you do not like, should you still be friends with him or her? 73
- Do you agree or disagree?It is better to relax by watching a movie or reading a book than doing physical exercise 76
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific theories presented in the reading passage. where origin of the Voynich manuscript? 73
- The university has provided students who are going to enter university with two summer vacation programs Which one do you think is better for students 1 Take some college courses in advance e g some courses that are related to student s major 2 Visit some 77
- Summaries the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage. the source of quackers 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 250, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ble conditions for living on asteroids. The lecture challenges the statement made b...
^^^
Line 13, column 327, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...em, but get back to Earth is difficult. The professor mentions that asteroids can o...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1577.0 1373.03311258 115% => OK
No of words: 311.0 270.72406181 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07073954984 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68315981152 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540192926045 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 419.366225166 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.3159144409 49.2860985944 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.6111111111 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2777777778 21.698381199 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88888888889 7.06452816374 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16657652783 0.272083759551 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0544083776881 0.0996497079465 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486825164849 0.0662205650399 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0990642396652 0.162205337803 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402809170834 0.0443174109184 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.3589403974 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 63.6247240618 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.