Ethanol fuel, made from plants such as corn and sugar cane, has been advocated by some people as an alternative to gasoline in the United States. However, many critics argue that ethanol is not a good replacement for gasoline for several reasons.
First, the increased use of ethanol fuel would not help tosolve one of the biggest environmental problems caused by gasoline use: global warming. Like gasoline, ethanol releases carbon dioxide into the atmosphere when it is burned for fuel and carbon dioxide is greenhouse gas: it helps trap heat in the atmosphere. Thus, ethanol offers no environmental advantage over gasoline.
Second, the production of significant amounts of ethanol would dramatically reduce the amount of plants available for uses other fuel. For example, much of the corn now grown in the United States is used to feed farm animals such as cows and chickens. It is estimated that if ethanol were used to satisfy just 10 percent of the fuel needs in the United States, more than 60 percent of the corn currently grown in the united stated would have to be used to produce ethanol. If most of the corn were used to produce ethanol, a substantial source of food for animals would disappear.
Third, ethanol fuel will never be able to compete with gasoline on price. Although the prices of ethanol and gasoline for the consumer are currently about the same, this is only because of the help in the form of tax subsidies given to ethanol producers by the United States government. These tax subsidies have cost the United States government over $11 billion in the past 30 years. If the United States government were to stop helping producers in this way, the price of ethanol would increase greatly.
the reading claims that ethanol is not a god replacment for gasoline.however, the lecture finds all ideas dubious and presents some evidence to refute them all.
the authore argues that replacment of ethanol does not solvse global warming, becaouse it is releases carbon dioxide into the atomosphere too.conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that although burning ethanol release carbon dioxcid but as a part of a plants growth, the plant absorbe carbone dioxide so it reduce the level of carbone dioxide in atmosphere.
furthermore, the reading passage holds the view that if most of corn were used to produse ethanol, a substantional source of food for animals would disappear on the contrary, the professore underline the fact that corn has many parts and ethanol is made from its selelose and animals can feed other parts the corn.
finally, the reading asserts that if goverment of united sates stop helping producers in this way,the price of ethanol would increase greatly. in contrast, the speaker dissmisses this issue due to the fact that the united state goverment will countinue its helps and eventhough if people stope buying ethanol the factorys will start to produce more and research claims that if the amount of produceing increase in three times the cost will diminish in 40 %.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-27 | sandeshbhandari2 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | supergirl20 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | supergirl20 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-21 | nusybah | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | S M Naimul Mamun | 71 | view |
- TPO-41 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO 50 integrated 3
- TPO-45 - Independent Writing Task 3
- TPO INTEGRATED 51 3
- TPO-50 - Independent Writing Task 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the reading claims that ethanol is not a go...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ts some evidence to refute them all. the authore argues that replacment of ethan...
^^^
Line 4, column 259, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'plants'' or 'plant's'?
Suggestion: plants'; plant's
...lease carbon dioxcid but as a part of a plants growth, the plant absorbe carbone dioxi...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 314, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'reduces'?
Suggestion: reduces
...the plant absorbe carbone dioxide so it reduce the level of carbone dioxide in atmosph...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Furthermore
...el of carbone dioxide in atmosphere. furthermore, the reading passage holds the view tha...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Finally
...imals can feed other parts the corn. finally, the reading asserts that if goverment ...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 98, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...sates stop helping producers in this way,the price of ethanol would increase greatly...
^^^^
Line 8, column 144, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...rice of ethanol would increase greatly. in contrast, the speaker dissmisses this i...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, furthermore, however, if, so, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1100.0 1373.03311258 80% => OK
No of words: 213.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16431924883 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67480815292 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.62441314554 0.540411800872 116% => OK
syllable_count: 338.4 419.366225166 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 13.0662251656 38% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 42.0 21.2450331126 198% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 89.8389670466 49.2860985944 182% => OK
Chars per sentence: 220.0 110.228320801 200% => OK
Words per sentence: 42.6 21.698381199 196% => OK
Discourse Markers: 16.8 7.06452816374 238% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220536190935 0.272083759551 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109010660082 0.0996497079465 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423767756114 0.0662205650399 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12171547497 0.162205337803 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0369409432403 0.0443174109184 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 24.2 13.3589403974 181% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.85 53.8541721854 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 19.7 11.0289183223 179% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.54 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.02 8.42419426049 119% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.7273730684 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.8 10.498013245 179% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.2008830022 179% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.