The food industry has been overusing hard to recycle plastic packaging However it has caused severe environmental issues As a solution to the plastic packaging crisis casein based plastic packages which are made out of milk proteins have recently been inv

Essay topics:

The food industry has been overusing hard-to-recycle plastic packaging. However, it has caused severe environmental issues. As a solution to the plastic packaging crisis, casein-based plastic packages, which are made out of milk proteins, have recently been invented. The edible milk-based packaging promises to have advantages in general.

First of all, using casein would reduce a large amount of waste. Casein-based wraps are biodegradable, which means they can easily dissolve in water. The good news is, they hardly have any impact on the maritime environment. This is because casein is a chief protein in milk, and protein does not do any harm to the environment when disposed of. Significant drops in landfills can be expected.

Second, food can stay fresher when using casein-based plastic packages. Casein is much more effective in blocking oxygen due to its pores, which are smaller than those of other kinds of plastic materials. Since casein-based films possess strength and low oxygen permeability, they become more effective in preventing food spoilage during distribution processes.

Third, casein-based plastic bags can be nutritious. While many other edible plastic packages are made out of starch, casein contains a high number of proteins and other edible substances such as hydroxyl and amino groups, which are good for producing enzymes, hormones and other bodily chemicals. These are also very nutritious for our bones and muscles. Other nutrients, such as vitamins or probiotics, can be added for more health benefits.

Due to overusing of plastic packaging and its threatning environmental issues, the passage mentions a possible solution to plastic packaging that is casein-based packaging by proving some facts about it. However, the lecturer opposes this facts by providing certain evidences which are mentioned below.
Firstly, in the passage it is mentioned that casein can reduce waste due to its biodegradibility and hence drops in landfills is expected. However, the lecturer believes that the waste cannot be decreased. Due to casein's vulnerability to water and high temperature instead there might be increase in waste due to its disposal.
Secondly, in the passage it is mentioned that food refreshment is restored using casein package due to its property of blocking oxygen due to its pores and thus preventing food spoilage. But, the lecturer opposes by saying that food could not be free from spoilage. The water can act as a plasticizer and can affect the taste of food.
Lastly, in the passage it is mentioned that casein bags are edible due to presence of high amount of protien and hydroxyl and amino acids. But, the lecturer points out this by saying that this substance are common to the substances present in milk. So, people having milk allergy can have adverse effect on their health if they consume casein plastic bags.
In conclusion, the lecturer points out flaws in the advantages of casein plastic bags by providing evidences.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-07-07 Huge Jackman 71 view
2020-12-09 Pravin s. jadhav 80 view
2020-11-01 29roysoma 81 view
2020-09-28 ParthShah03 76 view
2020-09-18 anonymus 90 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user ParthShah03 :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, thus, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1205.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 235.0 270.72406181 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12765957447 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75830693178 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523404255319 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 375.3 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9661106553 49.2860985944 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.416666667 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5833333333 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06452816374 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234997194211 0.272083759551 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0840555413059 0.0996497079465 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.098674279836 0.0662205650399 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143520798517 0.162205337803 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0914453567372 0.0443174109184 206% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.