The food industry has been overusing hard-to-recycle plastic packaging. However, it has caused severe environmental issues. As a solution to the plastic packaging crisis, casein-based plastic packages, which are made out of milk proteins, have recently been invented. The edible milk-based packaging promises to have advantages in general.
First of all, using casein would reduce a large amount of waste. Casein-based wraps are biodegradable, which means they can easily dissolve in water. The good news is, they hardly have any impact on the maritime environment. This is because casein is a chief protein in milk, and protein does not do any harm to the environment when disposed of. Significant drops in landfills can be expected.
Second, food can stay fresher when using casein-based plastic packages. Casein is much more effective in blocking oxygen due to its pores, which are smaller than those of other kinds of plastic materials. Since casein-based films possess strength and low oxygen permeability, they become more effective in preventing food spoilage during distribution processes.
Third, casein-based plastic bags can be nutritious. While many other edible plastic packages are made out of starch, casein contains a high number of proteins and other edible substances such as hydroxyl and amino groups, which are good for producing enzymes, hormones and other bodily chemicals. These are also very nutritious for our bones and muscles. Other nutrients, such as vitamins or probiotics, can be added for more health benefits.
As a solution to rising plastic waste casein based plastic packages are introduced. In reading various benefits of these casein are discussed, however lecture suggests some contrasting points to the reading. These are as follows:
First of all, reading says that casein based wraps are biodegradable, have hardly any impact on environment, and it would reduce the waste quantity. Whereas, lecture have contradictory point which is, casein in vulnerable to high temperature and water and this requires extra packaging, we cannot use casein wraps on the casein, hence we would have to use synthetic packaging, and this definitely will not help to reduce the waste. Moreover, using synthetic packaging will damage the environment more than before.
Secondly, reading suggests that casein would help in keeping the food fresh avoiding spoilage but, lecture asserts that due to vulnerability of casein towards water and high temperature it will not avoid food spoilage. Also casein will change the taste of food as it can absorb and release the water, moreover casein based packaging is not hygenic.
Finally, reading states that casein based plastic bags are edible and nutritious as they contain protiens, hydroxyl, and amino groups which are edible substances. This helps in producing enzymes, hormones and some chemicals which are nutritious to bones and muscles. On the other hand lecture tells about one fact which reading has overlooked which is, people who have milk allergies. Casein plastic bags are made of milk protien which can be benefitial to people but can be threat to some lactose intolerent people. Such casein bags will be very painfull to these people.
To sum up, reading has suggested many advantages of casein based packaging but, lecture have some contrasting views as discussed above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-07 | Huge Jackman | 71 | view |
| 2020-12-09 | Pravin s. jadhav | 80 | view |
| 2020-11-01 | 29roysoma | 81 | view |
| 2020-09-28 | ParthShah03 | 76 | view |
| 2020-09-18 | anonymus | 90 | view |
- The food industry has been overusing hard to recycle plastic packaging However it has caused severe environmental issues As a solution to the plastic packaging crisis casein based plastic packages which are made out of milk proteins have recently been inv 80
- Science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society s problems Write a response to the prompt in which you discuss whether or not you agree or disagree Be certain to fully develop your position and carefully consider ways in which your pos 50
- Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs 16
- Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development 50
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Our current way of life will have a negative impact on future generations Use specific reasons and examples to support your essay Be sure to use your own words 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
As a solution to rising plastic waste case...
^^
Line 1, column 116, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this casein' or 'these caseins'?
Suggestion: this casein; these caseins
...roduced. In reading various benefits of these casein are discussed, however lecture suggests...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 220, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...rature it will not avoid food spoilage. Also casein will change the taste of food as...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, hence, however, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, whereas, first of all, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1531.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 287.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33449477352 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58897444377 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526132404181 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 419.366225166 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 8.23620309051 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.2631248388 49.2860985944 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.769230769 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0769230769 21.698381199 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1538461538 7.06452816374 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262293559435 0.272083759551 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107757515967 0.0996497079465 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0915234075618 0.0662205650399 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156810669902 0.162205337803 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482471367509 0.0443174109184 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.3589403974 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.8541721854 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.0289183223 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.