forest fires in Yellowstone "let it burn" policy

Essay topics:

forest fires in Yellowstone "let it burn" policy

The reading and the lecture talk about the policy of forest fire. The passage expresses that the “let it burn” policy causes huge damage, but the lecture disagrees with it and thinks the forest fire does not only do damage but also creative.

First, the passage mentions that due to the huge scale of the fire, the park’s trees and vegetation was damaged tremendously. However the professor says it can increase the diversity. The area colonized by trees now has an opportunity to smaller plants, which it can’t grows due to the shade of trees.

Second, the reading indicates wild life was affected as well. The lecturer proposed the population has recovered. For addition, the fire also creates an ideal habitat to new animals such as rabbits and squirrels. While the flourish of these bottom animals in food chain, the predators also grows as well.

Last but not least, the reading appeals the fire will decrease the amount of tourists, which affects the economy. Once again, the woman challenges the statement by the rarity of Yellowstone fire, which do not occurs every year. For another word, the tourists will come back next year and each year after that. So it do not cause much damage in economy.

To conclude, the “let it burn” policy causes a lot of damage apparently, but the fire is the natural circle and it recreates the ecology after that.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-08-19 Yash Mehta 71 view
2023-07-30 nusybah 85 view
2023-05-23 HRBM 76 view
2023-03-10 pearlchu- 86 view
2023-03-10 pearlchu- 86 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Olly :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ot only do damage but also creative. First, the passage mentions that due to ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 132, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...nd vegetation was damaged tremendously. However the professor says it can increase the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s;t grows due to the shade of trees. Second, the reading indicates wild life ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 115, Rule ID: ON_ADDITION[1]
Message: Did you mean 'in'?
Suggestion: In
... proposed the population has recovered. For addition, the fire also creates an idea...
^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n, the predators also grows as well. Last but not least, the reading appeals ...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 210, Rule ID: DONT_NEEDS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'occur'?
Suggestion: occur
...arity of Yellowstone fire, which do not occurs every year. For another word, the touri...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 317, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'does'?
Suggestion: does
...xt year and each year after that. So it do not cause much damage in economy. ...
^^
Line 15, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...do not cause much damage in economy. To conclude, the 'let it burn'...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, first, however, if, second, so, well, while, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1179.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 234.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03846153846 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47960856113 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568376068376 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 365.4 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.5667125026 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.2142857143 110.228320801 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7142857143 21.698381199 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35714285714 7.06452816374 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18858034458 0.272083759551 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0593098813876 0.0996497079465 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0780583490133 0.0662205650399 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110227008363 0.162205337803 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0925945132888 0.0443174109184 209% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.3589403974 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.