FROGS
The reading and the lecture discuss whether the solutions of reading for protecting frogs from declining and even extinction are good or not. The reading gives three solutions for this problem and says that they reduce declining. However, the professor refutes all solutions and states that they are not adequate.
First, reduce the using of pesticides by farmers. The reading claims that pesticides cause a problem for frogs and the farmers should do not use this chemical substance or reduce them in farmland. On the other hand, the professor states that the farmers use pesticides based on the instruction and follow strict regular rules. Moreover, this solution is not an economical solution and brings about some problems for farmers.
In addition, the fungus is another factor of frog declining. According to the passage, the reason of frogs’ thick skin is the fungus, then researchers have found that by using heat can kill the fungus. In contrast, the lecture refutes this idea and says that the fungus damage individual frogs,so using this method for a large scale is very hard. In addition, it does not prevent the offshore species, then they must use for every generation and it is very expensive.
Finally, human activity is another cause of frog declining. Despite the fact that human activity provides some serious problem for frogs’ habitats and vanish the water and wetland habitats, the global warming is the main reason for damaging water habitats. The professor states that in the last years the global warming has increased and evaporated the water. Therefore, the global warming extinct not only frog habitats, but also other species.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-11 | sanddy | 80 | view |
| 2023-07-18 | dxy40747 | 3 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | YasamanEsml | 88 | view |
| 2023-07-10 | zuhn | 80 | view |
| 2023-07-07 | Hibahtabbaa | 71 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 299, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , so
... that the fungus damage individual frogs,so using this method for a large scale is ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, moreover, so, then, therefore, in addition, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 7.30242825607 205% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 30.3222958057 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1409.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 270.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21851851852 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48711632206 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514814814815 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.2639071902 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.9333333333 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06452816374 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231016037386 0.272083759551 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0973041687132 0.0996497079465 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111604487461 0.0662205650399 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144070465243 0.162205337803 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.05947300037 0.0443174109184 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.