How building were used for chaco Canyon people in New Mexico.
The passage and the lecture discuss how settlement buildings could have been used in the Grand Canyon in New Mexico. The reading holds that archaeologists come up with three potential theories about how stone buildings known as “great houses” were used in the early twelfth century.
Since the buildings have more than a hundred rooms and have similarities to the modern building, the passage believed that they were used as residential apartments. The lecturer claimed that this theory is unconvincing. Residential buildings must have fireplaces in each room to operate properly, but these buildings only had a few fireplaces to accommodate at least 10 families, not hundreds as the reading claims.
The second theory that the passage suggested is that the Chaco building may have been used as store food supplies because maize was one of the main crops harvested by the Chaco people. Maize could be stored for long periods, and the great houses looked suitable for such a purpose. According to the lecture, there is enough evidence to prove that the great houses were not used to store maize because after the excavation researchers got to the conclusion. If the great houses had been used to store maize, there would have been huge maize containers and probably maize spilled on the floor.
A third theory, the great houses might have been used for ceremonial purposes as the passages claimed. There were found a surprising number of broken pots and this evidence was taken as people might have gathered for special ceremonies. The lecture refutes this theory. There is not enough evidence to hold this claim. Besides the broken pots, there are more broken materials that might have been left in a construction process for example stone, construction material, sand, and regular trash. Moreover, the broken pots might have been the containers that were used for workers to eat.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-02 | Uhernandes95 | 60 | view |
- People should be realistic rather than romantic in order to live a better life 80
- Some people prefer the quiet life of the country while others prefer the hustle and bustle of city life Compare and contrast the two lifestyles Which do you prefer 85
- Increased of the sea levels 73
- Some people choose friends who are different from themselves Others choose friends who are similar to themselves Compare the advantages of having friends who are different from you with the advantages of having friends who are similar to you Which kind of 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement A teacher s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 279, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s were used in the early twelfth century Since the buildings have more than a hun...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 585, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and probably maize spilled on the floor A third theory the great houses might ha...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 575, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ainers that were used for workers to eat
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, look, may, moreover, second, third, at least, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 10.4613686534 191% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1373.03311258 113% => OK
No of words: 310.0 270.72406181 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00967741935 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44461863074 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487096774194 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 481.5 419.366225166 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 13.0662251656 8% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 310.0 21.2450331126 1459% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.2860985944 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1553.0 110.228320801 1409% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 310.0 21.698381199 1429% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 75.0 7.06452816374 1062% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31209537626 0.272083759551 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.31209537626 0.0996497079465 313% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193335540747 0.162205337803 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0880118679425 0.0443174109184 199% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 157.2 13.3589403974 1177% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -243.17 53.8541721854 -452% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 5.55761589404 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 124.2 11.0289183223 1126% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.26 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 22.12 8.42419426049 263% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 59.0 10.7273730684 550% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 126.0 10.498013245 1200% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 59.0 11.2008830022 527% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.